OBJECT: Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a rapid and accurate means for longitudinal study of tumor cell growth and response to therapy in rodent models. Because this technology has only recently come into use in the field of small animal imaging, applications in this area have been limited. In the current study we have applied BLI to the analysis of clinically relevant issues involving use of the DNA methylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) in a mouse model. METHODS: An invasive glioblastoma multiforme xenograft was modified for BLI via transduction with a luciferase-encoding lentivirus. Supratentorial tumors were established in athymic nude mice that were subsequently assigned randomly to control and TMZ treatment groups, and the extent of intracranial tumor was monitored using BLI. RESULTS: In an experiment designed to compare the extent of antitumor effect between a single high-dose TMZ treatment and a protracted low-dose TMZ regimen, BLI revealed the protracted regimen as having superior antitumor effect, and this interpretation was consistent with results from a survival comparison between the two TMZ treatment groups. In a second experiment designed to assess the utility of BLI for testing therapies against recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, mice with intracranial tumors were retreated with TMZ at a time when BLI monitoring revealed tumor regrowth following initial TMZ treatment, and retreatment was successful in providing additional survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these experiments indicate that BLI monitoring can be used as a surrogate for predicting survival benefit from TMZ treatment, permits early determination of relative survival benefit associated with distinct TMZ therapeutic regimens, and offers a means of investigating secondary/salvage therapy efficacy following tumor regrowth from initial therapy.
OBJECT: Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a rapid and accurate means for longitudinal study of tumor cell growth and response to therapy in rodent models. Because this technology has only recently come into use in the field of small animal imaging, applications in this area have been limited. In the current study we have applied BLI to the analysis of clinically relevant issues involving use of the DNA methylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) in a mouse model. METHODS: An invasive glioblastoma multiforme xenograft was modified for BLI via transduction with a luciferase-encoding lentivirus. Supratentorial tumors were established in athymic nude mice that were subsequently assigned randomly to control and TMZ treatment groups, and the extent of intracranial tumor was monitored using BLI. RESULTS: In an experiment designed to compare the extent of antitumor effect between a single high-dose TMZ treatment and a protracted low-dose TMZ regimen, BLI revealed the protracted regimen as having superior antitumor effect, and this interpretation was consistent with results from a survival comparison between the two TMZ treatment groups. In a second experiment designed to assess the utility of BLI for testing therapies against recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, mice with intracranial tumors were retreated with TMZ at a time when BLI monitoring revealed tumor regrowth following initial TMZ treatment, and retreatment was successful in providing additional survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these experiments indicate that BLI monitoring can be used as a surrogate for predicting survival benefit from TMZ treatment, permits early determination of relative survival benefit associated with distinct TMZ therapeutic regimens, and offers a means of investigating secondary/salvage therapy efficacy following tumor regrowth from initial therapy.
Authors: Laura P Serwer; Charles O Noble; Karine Michaud; Daryl C Drummond; Dmitri B Kirpotin; Tomoko Ozawa; Michael D Prados; John W Park; C David James Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Gilson S Baia; Otavia L Caballero; Brent A Orr; Anita Lal; Janelle S Y Ho; Cynthia Cowdrey; Tarik Tihan; Christian Mawrin; Gregory J Riggins Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Piotr Hadaczek; Tomoko Ozawa; Liliana Soroceanu; Yasuyuki Yoshida; Lisa Matlaf; Eric Singer; Estefania Fiallos; C David James; Charles S Cobbs Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yasuyuki Yoshida; Tomoko Ozawa; Tsun-Wen Yao; Wang Shen; Dennis Brown; Andrew T Parsa; Jeffrey J Raizer; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Alexander H Stegh; Andrew P Mazar; Francis J Giles; Jann N Sarkaria; Nicholas Butowski; Theodore Nicolaides; C David James Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Michelle J Clarke; Evan A Mulligan; Patrick T Grogan; Ann C Mladek; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Nicola J Curtin; Zhenkun Lou; Paul A Decker; Wenting Wu; E Ruth Plummer; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Cigall Kadoch; Eduard B Dinca; Ramona Voicu; Lingjing Chen; Diana Nguyen; Seema Parikh; Juliana Karrim; Marc A Shuman; Clifford A Lowell; Patrick A Treseler; C David James; James L Rubenstein Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kan V Lu; Shaojun Zhu; Anna Cvrljevic; Tiffany T Huang; Shawn Sarkaria; David Ahkavan; Julie Dang; Eduard B Dinca; Seema B Plaisier; Isaac Oderberg; Yohan Lee; Zugen Chen; Jeremy S Caldwell; Yongmin Xie; Joseph A Loo; David Seligson; Arnab Chakravari; Francis Y Lee; Roberto Weinmann; Timothy F Cloughesy; Stanley F Nelson; Gabriele Bergers; Thomas Graeber; Frank B Furnari; C David James; Webster K Cavenee; Terrance G Johns; Paul S Mischel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Rintaro Hashizume; Tomoko Ozawa; Eduard B Dinca; Anuradha Banerjee; Michael D Prados; Charles D James; Nalin Gupta Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-07-08 Impact factor: 4.130