Literature DB >> 17886272

Global gene expression analysis of bovine blastocysts produced by multiple methods.

Wenli Zhou1, Tianhao Xiang, Shawn Walker, Vicki Farrar, Earl Hwang, Brian Findeisen, Sanaz Sadeghieh, Fernando Arenivas, Ronald V Abruzzese, Irina Polejaeva.   

Abstract

Reproductive efficiency using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technology remains suboptimal. Of the various efforts to improve the efficiency, chromatin transfer (CT) and clone-clone aggregation (NTagg) have been reported to produce live cloned animals. To better understand the molecular mechanisms of somatic cell reprogramming during SCNT and assess the various SCNT methods on the molecular level, we performed gene expression analysis on bovine blastocysts produced via standard nuclear transfer (NT), CT, NTagg, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and artificial insemination (AI), as well as on somatic donor cells, using bovine genome arrays. The expression profiles of SCNT (NT, CT, NTagg) embryos were compared with IVF and AI embryos as well as donor cells. NT and CT embryos have indistinguishable gene expression patterns. In comparison to IVF or AI embryos, the number of differentially expressed genes in NTagg embryos is significantly higher than in NT and CT embryos. Genes that were differentially expressed between all the SCNT embryos and IVF or AI embryos are identified. Compared to AI embryos, more than half of the genes found deregulated between SCNT and AI embryos appear to be the result of in vitro culture alone. The results indicate that although SCNT methods have altered differentiated somatic nuclei gene expression to more closely resemble that of embryonic nuclei, combination of insufficient reprogramming and in vitro culture condition compromise the developmental potential of SCNT embryos. This is the first set of comprehensive data for analyzing the molecular impact of various nuclear transfer methods on bovine pre-implantation embryos. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17886272     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  9 in total

1.  Effect of L-carnitine supplementation on maturation and early embryo development of immature mouse oocytes selected by brilliant cresyle blue staining.

Authors:  Zohreh Zare; Reza Masteri Farahani; Mohammad Salehi; Abbas Piryaei; Marefat Ghaffari Novin; Fatemeh Fadaei Fathabadi; Moslem Mohammadi; Maryam Dehghani-Mohammadabadi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Transcriptional reprogramming of gene expression in bovine somatic cell chromatin transfer embryos.

Authors:  Nelida Rodriguez-Osorio; Zhongde Wang; Poothappillai Kasinathan; Grier P Page; James M Robl; Erdogan Memili
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Reshaping the transcriptional frontier: epigenetics and somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Charles R Long; Mark E Westhusin; Michael C Golding
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Differential developmental competence and gene expression patterns in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed with fetal fibroblasts and amnion mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Fozia Shah; P S Yadav
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Resveratrol treatment during goat oocytes maturation enhances developmental competence of parthenogenetic and hand-made cloned blastocysts by modulating intracellular glutathione level and embryonic gene expression.

Authors:  Ayan Mukherjee; Hrudananda Malik; Ambika P Saha; Amit Dubey; Dinesh Kumar Singhal; Samuel Boateng; Shrabani Saugandhika; Sudarshan Kumar; Sachinandan De; Shyamal Kanti Guha; Dhruba Malakar
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Validation of reference genes for use in untreated bovine fibroblasts.

Authors:  T Toorani; P M Mackie; G F Mastromonaco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Epigenetic modification with trichostatin A does not correct specific errors of somatic cell nuclear transfer at the transcriptomic level; highlighting the non-random nature of oocyte-mediated reprogramming errors.

Authors:  Sayyed Morteza Hosseini; Isabelle Dufort; Julie Nieminen; Fariba Moulavi; Hamid Reza Ghanaei; Mahdi Hajian; Farnoosh Jafarpour; Mohsen Forouzanfar; Hamid Gourbai; Abdol Hossein Shahverdi; Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani; Marc-André Sirard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Longitudinal study of reproductive performance of female cattle produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Irina A Polejaeva; Diane M Broek; Shawn C Walker; Wenli Zhou; Mark Walton; Abby D Benninghoff; David C Faber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Factors affecting the development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in Cattle.

Authors:  Satoshi Akagi; Kazutsugu Matsukawa; Seiya Takahashi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.214

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.