Sue Morison1, John Jenkins. 1. Centre for Excellence in Interprofessional Education (NI), School of Medicine & Dentistry Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. s.morison@qub.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delivering high quality healthcare increasingly requires effective team working, and interprofessional shared learning (SL) is crucial to this. This study compares the attitudes, 1 year after experience of an undergraduate SL programme, of students who had participated in the programme with their peers who had not. METHODS: 207 students were invited to complete a questionnaire to assess the impact of SL on attitudes to clinical competence and behaviour. Responses were received from 171 students (83%) who had either had no experience of SL, SL in lectures only, or SL in lectures and clinical placement. RESULTS: Significantly different responses were found between the three groups for a number of the statements, and these were further developed in responses to the open-ended questions. Only group 3 had developed and sustained a less exclusive attitude and were better able to appreciate that SL can make an important contribution to learning communication skills and understanding patient problems. CONCLUSIONS: This raises important questions about the approach taken to undergraduate SL if it is to have a contributory effect to attitudes about professional identity, and a significant effect in improving the quality of care provided by the doctors and nurses of tomorrow.
BACKGROUND: Delivering high quality healthcare increasingly requires effective team working, and interprofessional shared learning (SL) is crucial to this. This study compares the attitudes, 1 year after experience of an undergraduate SL programme, of students who had participated in the programme with their peers who had not. METHODS: 207 students were invited to complete a questionnaire to assess the impact of SL on attitudes to clinical competence and behaviour. Responses were received from 171 students (83%) who had either had no experience of SL, SL in lectures only, or SL in lectures and clinical placement. RESULTS: Significantly different responses were found between the three groups for a number of the statements, and these were further developed in responses to the open-ended questions. Only group 3 had developed and sustained a less exclusive attitude and were better able to appreciate that SL can make an important contribution to learning communication skills and understanding patient problems. CONCLUSIONS: This raises important questions about the approach taken to undergraduate SL if it is to have a contributory effect to attitudes about professional identity, and a significant effect in improving the quality of care provided by the doctors and nurses of tomorrow.
Authors: J Evans; A J Henderson; J Sun; H Haugen; T Myhrer; C Maryan; K N Ivanow; A Cameron; N W Johnson Journal: Br Dent J Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 1.626
Authors: Carolyn Cj Teuwen; Rashmi Ra Kusurkar; Hermien Wh Schreurs; Hester Hem Daelmans; Saskia Sm Peerdeman Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Date: 2020-09-10
Authors: Cora L F Visser; Janneke A Wilschut; Ulviye Isik; Stéphanie M E van der Burgt; Gerda Croiset; Rashmi A Kusurkar Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 2.463