OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify changes in tumour expression profiling associated with short-term therapy of breast cancer patients with letrozole. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Microarray analysis was performed on RNA extracted from paired tumour core biopsies taken before and after 14 days of treatment with letrozole (2.5 mg/daily) in 58 patients. Changes in expression profile were identified by three different approaches on the basis of frequency of changes, magnitude of changes and significance analysis of microarray. RESULTS: No single gene was consistently changed by therapy in all cases. Fifty-two genes, however, were downregulated and 36 upregulated in at least 45 of the 58 cases. In terms of quantitative change, 46 genes showed at least a median 1.5-fold change in expression. Significance analysis of microarray identified 62 genes that were significantly changed by therapy (P<0.0001, 56 downregulated and six upregulated). All three approaches showed that greater numbers of genes were downregulated rather than upregulated. Merging data produced a total of 143 genes, which were subject to gene ontology and cluster analysis. The ontology of the 91 downregulated genes showed that they were functionally associated with cell cycle progression, particularly mitosis. In contrast, upregulated genes were associated with organ development, connective tissue extracellular matrix regulation and inflammatory response. Cluster analysis segregated the patients into four groups differing in patterns of gene expression. CONCLUSION: Genes have been identified which either change markedly or consistently in breast cancer after 14 days treatment with letrozole. These are new important data in understanding letrozole's molecular mechanism of action in breast cancers.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify changes in tumour expression profiling associated with short-term therapy of breast cancerpatients with letrozole. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Microarray analysis was performed on RNA extracted from paired tumour core biopsies taken before and after 14 days of treatment with letrozole (2.5 mg/daily) in 58 patients. Changes in expression profile were identified by three different approaches on the basis of frequency of changes, magnitude of changes and significance analysis of microarray. RESULTS: No single gene was consistently changed by therapy in all cases. Fifty-two genes, however, were downregulated and 36 upregulated in at least 45 of the 58 cases. In terms of quantitative change, 46 genes showed at least a median 1.5-fold change in expression. Significance analysis of microarray identified 62 genes that were significantly changed by therapy (P<0.0001, 56 downregulated and six upregulated). All three approaches showed that greater numbers of genes were downregulated rather than upregulated. Merging data produced a total of 143 genes, which were subject to gene ontology and cluster analysis. The ontology of the 91 downregulated genes showed that they were functionally associated with cell cycle progression, particularly mitosis. In contrast, upregulated genes were associated with organ development, connective tissue extracellular matrix regulation and inflammatory response. Cluster analysis segregated the patients into four groups differing in patterns of gene expression. CONCLUSION: Genes have been identified which either change markedly or consistently in breast cancer after 14 days treatment with letrozole. These are new important data in understanding letrozole's molecular mechanism of action in breast cancers.
Authors: Nyam-Osor Chimge; Sanjeev K Baniwal; Jingqin Luo; Simon Coetzee; Omar Khalid; Benjamin P Berman; Debu Tripathy; Matthew J Ellis; Baruch Frenkel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Chunyu Wang; Ivan P Uray; Abhijit Mazumdar; Julie Ann Mayer; Powel H Brown Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Cynthia X Ma; Feng Gao; Jingqin Luo; Donald W Northfelt; Matthew Goetz; Andres Forero; Jeremy Hoog; Michael Naughton; Foluso Ademuyiwa; Rama Suresh; Karen S Anderson; Julie Margenthaler; Rebecca Aft; Timothy Hobday; Timothy Moynihan; William Gillanders; Amy Cyr; Timothy J Eberlein; Tina Hieken; Helen Krontiras; Zhanfang Guo; Michelle V Lee; Nicholas C Spies; Zachary L Skidmore; Obi L Griffith; Malachi Griffith; Shana Thomas; Caroline Bumb; Kiran Vij; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Maria Koehler; Hussam Al-Kateb; Souzan Sanati; Matthew J Ellis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Bernie J Daigle; Alicia Deng; Tracey McLaughlin; Samuel W Cushman; Margaret C Cam; Gerald Reaven; Philip S Tsao; Russ B Altman Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Karen J Taylor; Andrew H Sims; Liang Liang; Dana Faratian; Morwenna Muir; Graeme Walker; Barbara Kuske; J Michael Dixon; David A Cameron; David J Harrison; Simon P Langdon Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: M Hauglid Flågeng; L L Haugan Moi; J M Dixon; J Geisler; E A Lien; W R Miller; P E Lønning; G Mellgren Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Vaibhav P Pai; Aaron M Marshall; Laura L Hernandez; Arthur R Buckley; Nelson D Horseman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 6.466