OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: We previously reported that nifedipine retard showed comparable efficacy to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for the prevention of cardiac events in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease during the Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases B study. In the nifedipine group, patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) showed a significant reduction in hospitalization for angina pectoris compared with the ACE inhibitor group. We investigated whether this difference was related to the progression of coronary arteriosclerosis. METHODS: To evaluate coronary arteriosclerosis, we performed coronary angiography (CAG) and a quantitative analysis of coronary angiograms. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of hospitalization for angina was significantly lower in the nifedipine group (log-rank test P = 0.013). The etiology of angina requiring hospitalization was determined on the basis of CAG findings. Its incidence secondary to the development of new lesions or the progression of existing lesions was significantly lower in the nifedipine group than in the ACE inhibitor group (log-rank test P = 0.042 and P = 0.028, respectively). Using quantitative coronary analysis, changes in the coronary artery luminal diameter were compared between the nifedipine and ACE inhibitor groups. The minimum coronary lumen diameter did not show a significant change in the nifedipine group, whereas it decreased significantly in the ACE inhibitor group (paired t-test P = 0.002), and there was a significant difference between the two groups by analysis of covariance (P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that nifedipine more effectively prevented admission for angina pectoris by inhibiting the progression of coronary artery disease in patients with a history of MI.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: We previously reported that nifedipine retard showed comparable efficacy to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for the prevention of cardiac events in hypertensivepatients with coronary artery disease during the Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases B study. In the nifedipine group, patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) showed a significant reduction in hospitalization for angina pectoris compared with the ACE inhibitor group. We investigated whether this difference was related to the progression of coronary arteriosclerosis. METHODS: To evaluate coronary arteriosclerosis, we performed coronary angiography (CAG) and a quantitative analysis of coronary angiograms. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of hospitalization for angina was significantly lower in the nifedipine group (log-rank test P = 0.013). The etiology of angina requiring hospitalization was determined on the basis of CAG findings. Its incidence secondary to the development of new lesions or the progression of existing lesions was significantly lower in the nifedipine group than in the ACE inhibitor group (log-rank test P = 0.042 and P = 0.028, respectively). Using quantitative coronary analysis, changes in the coronary artery luminal diameter were compared between the nifedipine and ACE inhibitor groups. The minimum coronary lumen diameter did not show a significant change in the nifedipine group, whereas it decreased significantly in the ACE inhibitor group (paired t-test P = 0.002), and there was a significant difference between the two groups by analysis of covariance (P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that nifedipine more effectively prevented admission for angina pectoris by inhibiting the progression of coronary artery disease in patients with a history of MI.