Literature DB >> 17885500

Squamous dysplasia of the uterine cervix: tissue sampling-related diagnostic considerations in 600 consecutive biopsies.

Oluwole Fadare1, Rosemarie Rodriguez.   

Abstract

Despite the technological advances in colposcopic techniques, there continues to be a 10% to 20% discordance rate between the colposcopic findings and the histological diagnoses on the resultant biopsies. One of the many factors to which this may be theoretically attributable is related to sampling error from the paraffin-embedded tissue block. In this study, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of routinely obtaining 6 sections in cervical biopsies, using the frequency with which dysplastic lesions would be missed with various levels of sectioning as the sole benchmark determinant of clinical efficacy. Our database was searched for all cervical biopsies in which a diagnosis of squamous dysplastic lesion was made for the period February 1, 2006 to April 28, 2006. All cases were processed in 6-level sectioning, which entails cutting and staining (hematoxylin-eosin) 6 consecutive sections from the paraffin block without preserving or discarding any intervening unstained sections. The first level at which a diagnosis of dysplastic lesion could be unequivocally made by a gynecologic pathologist was determined. Six hundred consecutive biopsies from 404 patients were reviewed. For the whole cohort, the average level at which a dysplastic lesion was unequivocally diagnosable was 1.9 (median, 1). Three hundred fifty-seven (59.5%), 97 (16.2%), 41 (6.8%), 55 (9.2%), 34 (5.7%), and 16 (2.6%) of the 600 lesions were diagnosable at levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 (n = 89) was, on average, diagnosable at an earlier level (1.35) compared with CIN 1 (level, 2.025; P < 0.001 [n = 511]). Indeed, 79.8% of the CIN 2-3 cases were diagnosable at level 1, as compared with 56% of the CIN 1 cases (P < 0.001); 87, 38, 52, 32, and 16 cases of CIN 1 and 10, 3, 3, 2, and 0 cases of CIN 2-3 were diagnosable at levels 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Therefore, if sectioning were limited to 3 levels, 17.5% (105/600) of all dysplastic lesions would have been missed, including 19.6% (100/511) of CIN 1 and 5.6% (5/89) of CIN 2-3. Because not more than 3 levels are routinely evaluated in most laboratories, our findings suggest that sampling error is indeed at least 1 significant factor contributing to colposcopic/histological discrepancies. Using our clinical efficacy standard, when no pathologic findings are initially identified in a colposcopic-directed biopsy, at least 5 levels (a priori or in recuts) are required to ensure a 100% diagnostic accuracy for CIN 2-3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17885500     DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0b013e318038154d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  7 in total

1.  [S3 guidelines on diagnostics and treatment of cervical cancer: Demands on pathology].

Authors:  L-C Horn; M W Beckmann; M Follmann; M C Koch; P Mallmann; S Marnitz; D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  [Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix: morphology and molecular pathology].

Authors:  L-C Horn; K Klostermann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  The Interpretive Variability of Cervical Biopsies and Its Relationship to HPV Status.

Authors:  Mark H Stoler; Brigitte M Ronnett; Nancy E Joste; William C Hunt; Jack Cuzick; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Optimization of Classification Strategies of Acetowhite Temporal Patterns towards Improving Diagnostic Performance of Colposcopy.

Authors:  Karina Gutiérrez-Fragoso; Héctor Gabriel Acosta-Mesa; Nicandro Cruz-Ramírez; Rodolfo Hernández-Jiménez
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Histopathological Diagnosis of Cervical Biopsies: Reduction of Sampling Errors with the Evaluation of a Third Histologic Level.

Authors:  Edgar Villegas-Hinojosa; Yolanda Terán-Figueroa; Veronica Gallegos-García; Dario Gaytán-Hernández; Sandra O Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Anahid E Campuzano-Barajas; Luz E Alcántara-Quintana
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Utility of p16INK4a expression for the interpretation of uterine cervical biopsies in Kenya.

Authors:  Thierry Zawadi Muvunyi; Eliane Rohner; Siobhan O'Connor; Ahmed Yakub Kalebi; Wairimu Waweru; John Kairu; Willis Ochuk; Jennifer Susan Smith; Lucy Wangari Muchiri
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-09-22

7.  Prognosis of high-risk human papillomavirus-related cervical lesions: A hidden Markov model analysis of a single-center cohort in Japan.

Authors:  Ryo Ikesu; Ayumi Taguchi; Konan Hara; Kei Kawana; Tetsushi Tsuruga; Jun Tomio; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.