Literature DB >> 17885138

Observed differences in diagnostic test accuracy between patient subgroups: is it real or due to reference standard misclassification?

Corné Biesheuvel1, Les Irwig, Patrick Bossuyt.   

Abstract

Before a new test is introduced in clinical practice, its accuracy should be assessed. In the past decade, researchers have put an increased emphasis on exploring differences in test sensitivity and specificity between patient subgroups. If the reference standard is imperfect and the prevalence of the target condition differs among subgroups, apparent differences in test sensitivity and specificity between subgroups may be caused by reference standard misclassification. We provide guidance on how to determine whether observed differences may be explained by reference standard misclassification. Such misclassification may be ascertained by examining how the apparent sensitivity and specificity change with the prevalence of the target condition in the subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17885138     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.087403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  4 in total

Review 1.  Temporal dimension in reference standard misclassification - a concept note.

Authors:  S A Rizwan; Baridalyne Nongkynrih; S Lena Charlette; Anand Krishnan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

2.  Impact of a clinical decision model for febrile children at risk for serious bacterial infections at the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Evelien de Vos-Kerkhof; Ruud G Nijman; Yvonne Vergouwe; Suzanne Polinder; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johan van der Lei; Henriëtte A Moll; Rianne Oostenbrink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Diagnosis of urinary tract infection based on symptoms: how are likelihood ratios affected by age? a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Anne Holm; Volkert Siersma; Gloria Cristina Cordoba
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Clinical accuracy of point-of-care urine culture in general practice.

Authors:  Anne Holm; Gloria Cordoba; Tina Møller Sørensen; Lisbeth Rem Jessen; Niels Frimodt-Møller; Volkert Siersma; Lars Bjerrum
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.581

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.