Literature DB >> 17884405

In situ examination of the time-course for secondary mineralization of Haversian bone using synchrotron Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy.

Robyn K Fuchs1, Matt R Allen, Meghan E Ruppel, Tamim Diab, Roger J Phipps, Lisa M Miller, David B Burr.   

Abstract

At the tissue level it is well established that the rate of remodeling is related to the degree of mineralization. However, it is unknown how long it takes for an individual bone structural unit (BSU) to become fully mineralized during secondary mineralization. Using synchrotron Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (FTIRM) we examined the time required for newly formed bone matrix to reach a physiological mineralization limit. Twenty-six, four-month old female New Zealand white rabbits were administered up to four different fluorochrome labels at specific time points to evaluate the chemical composition of labeled osteons from the tibial diaphysis that had mineralized for 1, 8, 18, 35, 70, 105, 140, 175, 210, 245, 280, 315, 350, and 385 days. Interstitial bone from 505 day old rabbits was used as a reference value for the physiological limit to which bone mineralizes. Using synchrotron FTIRM, area integrations were carried out on protein (Amide I: 1688-1623 cm(-1)), carbonate (v(2)CO(3)(2-): 905-825 cm(-1)), and phosphate (v(4)PO(4)(3-): 650-500 cm(-1)) IR bands. IR spectral data are presented as ratios of phosphate/protein (overall matrix mineralization) and carbonate/protein. The rate of mineralization of osteonal bone proceeded rapidly between day 1 and 18, reaching 67% of interstitial bone levels. This was followed by a slower, more progressive accumulation of mineral up to day 350. By 350 days the rate of increase plateaued. The ratio of carbonate/protein also increased rapidly during the first 18 days, reaching 73% of interstitial bone levels. The ratio of carbonate/protein plateaued by day 315, reaching levels not significantly different to interstitial bone levels. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that bone accumulates mineral rapidly during the first 18 days (primary mineralization), followed by a more gradual increase in the accumulation of mineral (secondary mineralization) which we found to be completed in 350 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17884405     DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2007.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matrix Biol        ISSN: 0945-053X            Impact factor:   11.583


  20 in total

Review 1.  Aging and bone.

Authors:  A L Boskey; R Coleman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Mineralization by inhibitor exclusion: the calcification of collagen with fetuin.

Authors:  Paul A Price; Damon Toroian; Joo Eun Lim
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of bone: a recent history.

Authors:  John Currey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The role of adaptive bone formation in the etiology of stress fracture.

Authors:  Julie M Hughes; Kristin L Popp; Ran Yanovich; Mary L Bouxsein; Ronald W Matheny
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-08-05

5.  Mineralization of cortical bone during maturation and growth in rabbits.

Authors:  Elin Törnquist; Hanna Isaksson; Mikael J Turunen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Cellular Processes by Which Osteoblasts and Osteocytes Control Bone Mineral Deposition and Maturation Revealed by Stage-Specific EphrinB2 Knockdown.

Authors:  Martha Blank; Natalie A Sims
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 7.  Long-term safety of antiresorptive treatment: bone material, matrix and mineralization aspects.

Authors:  Barbara M Misof; Nadja Fratzl-Zelman; Eleftherios P Paschalis; Paul Roschger; Klaus Klaushofer
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-02-11

8.  Prostate cancer metastases alter bone mineral and matrix composition independent of effects on bone architecture in mice--a quantitative study using microCT and Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xiaohong Bi; Julie A Sterling; Alyssa R Merkel; Daniel S Perrien; Jeffry S Nyman; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  Cortical bone development, maintenance and porosity: genetic alterations in humans and mice influencing chondrocytes, osteoclasts, osteoblasts and osteocytes.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Isojima; Natalie A Sims
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  The periosteum: what is it, where is it, and what mimics it in its absence?

Authors:  Jerry R Dwek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.