Literature DB >> 17883488

A meta-analysis of bird responses to uniform partial harvesting across North America.

Mark C Vanderwel1, Jay R Malcolm, Stephen C Mills.   

Abstract

Most data on the effects of partial-harvest silviculture (where live trees are purposely retained at the time of harvest) on birds come from one or a few discrete harvesting treatments. It is thus difficult to infer species responses across a continuous gradient of tree retention from individual studies. To quantify the levels of tree retention expected to produce specified changes in the relative abundance of individual species, we carried out a meta-analysis of 42 studies that examined the impacts of uniform partial harvesting on North American birds. Of 34 species, sigmoidal models showed a negative effect of harvesting for 14 species and a positive effect for 6 species. Ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla) and Brown Creepers (Certhia americana) were the species most sensitive to harvesting. Most of the 14 species that were negatively affected by harvesting showed 25%, 50%, and 75% reductions in abundance (relative to control sites) at tree retention levels ranging from 45 to 85%, 30-70%, and 15-50%, respectively. A few species, such as Yellow-rumped Warblers (Dendroica coronata), exhibited these levels of response at lower tree retention or were not predicted to decrease by 75% in harvested stands. Five of the 6 species that were positively affected by harvesting showed at least a 50% increase in abundance at nearly all levels of tree retention, although other early successional bird species did not appear to benefit from the relatively small openings created by uniform partial harvesting. Three of 20 species exhibited stronger responses to harvesting at a given level of tree retention in boreal and northern mixed forests of North America than other regions of the continent, but, with these exceptions, lack of variation among forest regions supported the broad-scale generality of species' responses to harvesting. The species response models we developed represent useful tools for evaluating stand-level impacts of partial harvesting on birds within an adaptive management framework. Uniform partial harvesting at light and, to a lesser degree, moderate intensities may be effective approaches to managing habitat for late successional bird species as part of broader ecosystem-based forest management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17883488     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00756.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katja Fedrowitz; Julia Koricheva; Susan C Baker; David B Lindenmayer; Brian Palik; Raul Rosenvald; William Beese; Jerry F Franklin; Jari Kouki; Ellen Macdonald; Christian Messier; Anne Sverdrup-Thygeson; Lena Gustafsson
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.528

2.  ENSO, nest predation risk, food abundance, and male status fail to explain annual variations in the apparent survival rate of a migratory songbird.

Authors:  Alizée Vernouillet; Marc-André Villard; Samuel Haché
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Emulating natural disturbances for declining late-successional species: a case study of the consequences for cerulean warblers (Setophaga cerulea).

Authors:  Than J Boves; David A Buehler; James Sheehan; Petra Bohall Wood; Amanda D Rodewald; Jeffrey L Larkin; Patrick D Keyser; Felicity L Newell; Gregory A George; Marja H Bakermans; Andrea Evans; Tiffany A Beachy; Molly E McDermott; Kelly A Perkins; Matthew White; T Bently Wigley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Meta-analysis of avian and small-mammal response to fire severity and fire surrogate treatments in U.S. fire-prone forests.

Authors:  Joseph B Fontaine; Patricia L Kennedy
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.657

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.