Literature DB >> 17882718

Intermediate-dose CY and G-CSF more efficiently mobilize adequate numbers of PBSC for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation compared with low-dose CY in patients with multiple myeloma.

D K Hiwase1, G Bollard, S Hiwase, M Bailey, J Muirhead, A P Schwarer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous PBSC transplantation is the standard care for patients with multiple myeloma. The most common regimen used to mobilize PBSC consists of CY and G-CSF.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens of CY for PBSC mobilization: low-dose CY (1-2 g/m(2), LD-CY, n=61) plus G-CSF, and intermediate-dose CY (3-4 g/m(2), ID-CY, n=26) plus G-CSF.
RESULTS: In the LD-CY group, 5.17 (0.23-17.3)x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, and in the ID-CY group 7.71 (0.08-26.4)x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (P=0.018), were collected. Although >/=2x10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells were collected in 89% of the LD-CY group and 92% of the ID-CY group, this was achieved after a single leukapheresis in 54% of the LD-CY group and 92% of the ID-CY group (P=0.0001). Patients who are to have tandem autologous PBSC transplants require >/=4x10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. This was achieved in only 65% patients in the LD-CY group but 88% in the ID-CY group (P=0.05). Among patients who had not had prior melphalan and/or >12 months of prior treatment, 74% in the LD-CY group and 100% in ID-CY group mobilized >/=4x10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. Febrile neutropenia was more frequent in the ID-CY group (38% vs. 13%). DISCUSSION: In conclusion, compared with LD-CY, patients receiving ID-CY were more likely to collect a total CD34(+) cell number adequate for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation. The increased toxicity was manageable and considered acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17882718     DOI: 10.1080/14653240701452800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  11 in total

1.  G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.

Authors:  A Antar; Z K Otrock; M A Kharfan-Dabaja; H A Ghaddara; N Kreidieh; R Mahfouz; A Bazarbachi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma comparison of two consecutive regimens in a limited resources country.

Authors:  N Ben Abdejlil; D Belloumi; M Mâammar; R El Fatimi; L Torjman; A Lakhal; F Jenhani; S Hmida; T Ben Othman; S Ladeb
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Advances in stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Rusudan K Hopman; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 4.  Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Anastasie M Dunn-Pirio; Benjamin M Heyman; Dan S Kaufman; Revere P Kinkel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  A randomized phase II study of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide+G-CSF or G-CSF alone after lenalidomide-based induction in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R Silvennoinen; P Anttila; M Säily; T Lundan; J Heiskanen; T M Siitonen; S Kakko; M Putkonen; H Ollikainen; V Terävä; A Kutila; K Launonen; A Räsänen; A Sikiö; M Suominen; P Bazia; K Kananen; T Selander; T Kuittinen; K Remes; E Jantunen
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplantation - a literature review.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Salvino; Jefferson Ruiz
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2015-08-19

7.  The High Effect of Chemomobilization with High-Dose Etopside + Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor in Autologous Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Şebnem Izmir Güner; Mustafa Teoman Yanmaz; Ahmet Selvi; Cigdem Usul
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2016-03-18

8.  Chemotherapy-based versus chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization (± plerixafor) in multiple myeloma patients: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Luca Castagna; Francesco Lanza; Daniele Laszlo; Giuseppe Milone; Luca Pierelli; Riccardo Saccardi; Carlo Lazzaro
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.174

Review 9.  Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: Growth factors or chemotherapy?

Authors:  Whitney D Wallis; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2017-10-24

Review 10.  A Review of Advances in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization and the Potential Role of Notch2 Blockade.

Authors:  Marwah Albakri; Hammad Tashkandi; Lan Zhou
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.