Literature DB >> 17882009

Individualizing the risks and benefits of postmenopausal hormone therapy.

Tjeerd P van Staa1, Cyrus Cooper, David Barlow, Hubert G M Leufkens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop an individualized risk-benefit model quantifying the impact of combined use of estrogen and progestogen on chronic diseases.
DESIGN: The study population consisted of women, aged 40+, prescribed postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) in the UK General Practice Research Database (N > 200,000). Individualized risks of fracture, colorectal cancer, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, breast cancer, and stroke were estimated using Cox regression. Relative rates from the Women's Health Initiative trial were used to estimate attributable risks (ie, excess risks) in a risk-benefit simulation model.
RESULTS: Risks and benefits increased with age and length of HT use. HT use for 5 years initiated at age 45 increased the absolute risk of myocardial infarction by 0.04% and breast cancer by 0.3% and reduced the risk of hip fracture by 0.03%. Comparably, 5-year HT use started at age 75 led to increases in the risks of myocardial infarction and breast cancer (+0.4% and +0.2%, respectively) and reduced that of hip fracture (-0.9%). There was considerable heterogeneity in the risks and benefits of HT. In most of the younger HT users, the frequency of risks exceeded that of the benefits, although the absolute excess risks were small. In HT users aged 70+, 62.4% experienced more benefits than risks, whereas 37.6% experienced more risks than benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of beneficial and adverse effects of HT on chronic diseases was low in younger women, whereas the ratio of these risks and benefits varied substantially among the older users. However, the study could not asses the effects of HT on menopausal symptoms and quality of life, benefits more likely to be observed among younger women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17882009     DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31812e558f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  4 in total

Review 1.  New approaches to drug safety: a pharmacovigilance tool kit.

Authors:  Lesley Wise; John Parkinson; June Raine; Alasdair Breckenridge
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Bioassay-guided evaluation of Dioscorea villosa - an acute and subchronic toxicity, antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory approach.

Authors:  Claudio Moreira Lima; Adriana Karla Lima; Marcelia G Dória Melo; Mairim Russo Serafini; Dênisson Lima Oliveira; Enrik Barbosa de Almeida; Rosana Souza Siqueira Barreto; Paulo Cesar de Lima Nogueira; Valéria Regina de Souza Moraes; Edica Ramone Andrade Oliveira; Ricardo Luiz Cavalcanti de Albuquerque; Lucindo J Quintans-Júnior; Adriano Antunes Souza Araújo
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.659

3.  A meta-analysis of reference values of leptin concentration in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Xi Zhou; YanLan Chai; Ke Chen; YunYi Yang; Zi Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Structured benefit-risk evaluation for medicinal products: review of quantitative benefit-risk assessment findings in the literature.

Authors:  Marie-Laure Kürzinger; Ludivine Douarin; Ievgeniia Uzun; Chantal El-Haddad; William Hurst; Juhaeri Juhaeri; Stéphanie Tcherny-Lessenot
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2020-12-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.