Literature DB >> 17881967

Comparison of open discectomy with microendoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Orlando Righesso1, Asdrubal Falavigna, Osmar Avanzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared the intra- and postoperative differences, as well as the final outcome of patients with herniated lumbar discs who underwent either open discectomy (OD) or microendoscopic discectomy (MED).
METHODS: We performed a prospective controlled randomized study of 40 patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniations nonresponsive to conservative treatment who underwent OD or MED with a 24-month follow-up period. Pre- and postoperative neurological status, pain, and functional outcome were evaluated. Other studied variables were the duration of the procedure, blood loss, time of hospital stay, and time to return to work. Statistical analysis with a P value less than 0.005 was carried out.
RESULTS: The only statistically significant differences found were for size of the incision, length of hospital stay, and operative time. The former two were greater in the OD group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.05, respectively), and the latter was greater in the MED group (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The few parameters that were found to be statistically significant between the groups did not affect the overall outcome. In the current series, the final clinical and neurological results were similarly satisfactory in both the OD and the MED groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17881967     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000290901.00320.F5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  50 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

2.  Achieving high research reporting quality through the use of computational ontologies.

Authors:  Amrapali Zaveri; Luciana Cofiel; Jatin Shah; Shreyasee Pradhan; Edwin Chan; Olivier Dameron; Ricardo Pietrobon; Beng Ti Ang
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2010-12

3.  Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Bronius Spakauskas; Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Louise H Anderson; Teresa Nelson; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-09

Review 5.  Herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Jo Jordan; Kika Konstantinou; John O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-03-26

Review 6.  Systematic review of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Nick Smith; James Masters; Cyrus Jensen; Almas Khan; Andrew Sprowson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy.

Authors:  Marco Teli; Alessio Lovi; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Antonino Zagra; Andrea Corriero; Fabrizio Giudici; Leone Minoia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Jo Jordan; Kika Konstantinou; John O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-28

9.  Feasibility of endoscopic discectomy by inter laminar approach at a high volume tertiary public hospital in a developing country.

Authors:  Shardul Madhav Soman; Jayprakash Vrajlal Modi; Jimmy Chokshi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03

Review 10.  The contribution of RCTs to quality management and their feasibility in practice.

Authors:  Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.