Literature DB >> 17881808

Preliminary assessment of one-dimensional MR elastography for use in monitoring focused ultrasound therapy.

Le Yuan1, Kevin J Glaser, Olivier Rouviere, Krzysztof R Gorny, Shigao Chen, Armando Manduca, Richard L Ehman, Joel P Felmlee.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to assess a fast technique that measures tissue stiffness and temperature during focused ultrasound thermal therapy (FUS). A one-dimensional (1D) MR elastography (MRE) pulse sequence was evaluated for the purpose of obtaining rapid measurements of thermally induced changes in tissue stiffness and temperature for monitoring FUS treatments. The accuracy of the 1D measurement was studied by comparing tissue displacements measured by 1D MRE with those measured by the well-established 2D MRE pulse sequence. The reproducibility of the 1D MRE measurement was assessed, in gel phantoms and ex vivo porcine tissue, for varied FUS intensity levels (31.5-199.9 W cm(-2)) and over a range of displacements at the focus (0.1-1 microm). Temperature elevations in agarose gel phantoms were measured using 1D MRE and calibrated using fiberoptic-thermometer-based measurements. The 1D MRE displacement measurements are highly correlated with those obtained with the 2D technique (R(2) = 0.88-0.93), indicating that 1D MRE can successfully measure tissue displacement. Ten repeated trials at each FUS power level yielded a minimum detectable displacement change of 0.2 microm in phantoms and 0.4 microm in tissue (at 95% confidence level). The 1D MRE temperature measurements correlated well with temperature changes measured simultaneously with fiberoptic thermometers (R(2) = 0.97). The 1D MRE technique is capable of detecting tissue displacements as low as 0.4 microm, which is an order of magnitude smaller than 5 microm displacements expected during FUS therapy (Le et al 2005 AIP Conf. Proc.: Ther. Ultrasound 829 186-90). Additionally, 1D MRE was shown to provide adequate measurements of temperature elevations in tissue. These findings indicate that 1D MRE may be an effective tool for monitoring FUS treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17881808     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/19/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  MR acoustic radiation force imaging: in vivo comparison to ultrasound motion tracking.

Authors:  Yuexi Huang; Laura Curiel; Aleksandra Kukic; Donald B Plewes; Rajiv Chopra; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Exploration of highly accelerated magnetic resonance elastography using high-density array coils.

Authors:  John C Bosshard; Naresh Yallapragada; Mary P McDougall; Steven M Wright
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-04

4.  Optimization of encoding gradients for MR-ARFI.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Ron Watkins; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  High-intensity focused ultrasound monitoring using harmonic motion imaging for focused ultrasound (HMIFU) under boiling or slow denaturation conditions.

Authors:  Gary Y Hou; Fabrice Marquet; Shutao Wang; Iason-Zacharias Apostolakis; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 9.795

Review 7.  Imaging and cancer: a review.

Authors:  Leonard Fass
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 7.449

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.