Literature DB >> 17881682

Accuracy of a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein ELISA to determine pregnancy status of lactating dairy cows twenty-seven days after timed artificial insemination.

E Silva1, R A Sterry, D Kolb, N Mathialagan, M F McGrath, J M Ballam, P M Fricke.   

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) ELISA in identifying pregnancy status 27 d after timed artificial insemination (TAI), blood samples were collected from lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,079) 27 d after their first, second, and third postpartum TAI services. Pregnancy diagnosis by transrectal ultrasonography (TU) was performed immediately after blood sample collection, and pregnancy outcomes by TU served as a standard to test the accuracy of the PAG ELISA. Pregnancy outcomes based on the PAG ELISA and TU that agreed were considered correct, whereas the pregnancy status of cows in which pregnancy outcomes between PAG and TU disagreed were reassessed by TU 5 d later. The accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis was less than expected when using TU 27 d after TAI (93.7 to 97.8%), especially when pregnancy outcomes were based on visualization of chorioallantoic fluid and a corpus luteum but when an embryo was not visualized. The accuracy of PAG ELISA outcomes 27 d after TAI was 93.7, 95.4, and 96.2% for first, second, and third postpartum TAI services, respectively. Statistical agreement (kappa) between TU and the PAG ELISA 27 d after TAI was 0.87 to 0.90. Pregnancy outcomes based on the PAG ELISA had a high negative predictive value, indicating that the probability of incorrectly administering PGF(2alpha) to pregnant cows would be low if this test were implemented on a commercial dairy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17881682     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

1.  Technical note: Validation of a chemical pregnancy test in dairy cows that uses whole blood, shortened incubation times, and visual readout.

Authors:  L M Mayo; S G Moore; S E Poock; W J Silvia; M C Lucy
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Establishment of a Sandwich-ELISA for simultaneous quantification of bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein in serum and milk.

Authors:  Tony Krebs; Isabel Kilic; Katja Mütze; Sonja Kleinhans; Daniel Lücking; Mark Hennies; Jens Tetens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Early pregnancy diagnosis in bovines: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Ashok K Balhara; Meenakshi Gupta; Surender Singh; Ashok K Mohanty; Inderjeet Singh
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-05

4.  Effect of feeding rumen-protected methionine on productive and reproductive performance of dairy cows.

Authors:  Mateus Z Toledo; Giovanni M Baez; Alvaro Garcia-Guerra; Nelson E Lobos; Jerry N Guenther; Eduardo Trevisol; Daniel Luchini; Randy D Shaver; Milo C Wiltbank
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of a Barium Chloride Test with ELISA for Pregnancy Detection in Cows.

Authors:  Omer Ismaeel Dana; Mnnat Talib Ghaidan; Rafiq Hamakarim Mukhtar; Hiewa Othman Dyary
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  Pregnancy detection and monitoring in cattle via combined foetus electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram signal processing.

Authors:  Gaetano D Gargiulo; Richard W Shephard; Jonathan Tapson; Alistair L McEwan; Paolo Bifulco; Mario Cesarelli; Craig Jin; Ahmed Al-Ani; Ning Wang; André van Schaik
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  PreImplantation factor (PIF) detection in maternal circulation in early pregnancy correlates with live birth (bovine model).

Authors:  Sivakumar Ramu; Christopher Stamatkin; Leo Timms; Marshall Ruble; Roumen G Roussev; Eytan R Barnea
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 8.  New approaches to diagnose and target reproductive failure in cattle.

Authors:  Ky Garrett Pohler; Sydney Taylor Reese; Gessica Araujo Franco; Ramiro Vander Oliveira; Rafael Paiva; Lohana Fernandez; Gabriela de Melo; José Luiz Moraes Vasconcelos; Reinaldo Cooke; Rebecca Kyle Poole
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.807

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.