Literature DB >> 17881485

Functional magnetic resonance imaging in zebra finch discerns the neural substrate involved in segregation of conspecific song from background noise.

Tiny Boumans1, Clémentine Vignal, Alain Smolders, Jan Sijbers, Marleen Verhoye, Johan Van Audekerke, Nicolas Mathevon, Annemie Van der Linden.   

Abstract

Recently, fMRI was introduced in a well-documented animal model for vocal learning, the songbird. Using fMRI and conspecific signals mixed with different levels of broadband noise, we now demonstrate auditory-induced activation representing discriminatory properties of auditory forebrain regions in anesthetized male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Earlier behavioral tests showed comparable calling responses to the original conspecific song stimulus heard outside and inside the magnet. A significant fMRI response was elicited by conspecific song in the primary auditory thalamo-recipient subfield L2a; in neighboring subareas L2b, L3, and L; and in the rostral part of the higher-order auditory area NCM (caudomedial nidopallium). Temporal BOLD response clustering revealed rostral and caudal clusters that we defined as "cluster Field L" and "cluster NCM", respectively. However, because the actual border between caudal Field L subregions and NCM cannot be seen in the structural MR image and is not precisely reported elsewhere, the cluster NCM might also contain subregion L and the medial extremes of the subregions L2b and L3. Our results show that whereas in cluster Field L the response was not reduced by added noise, in cluster NCM the response was reduced and finally disappeared with increasing levels of noise added to the song stimulus. The activation in cluster NCM was significant for only two experimental stimuli that showed significantly more behavioral responses than the more degraded stimuli, suggesting that the first area within the auditory system where the ability to discern song from masking noise emerges is located in cluster NCM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17881485     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00483.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) with auditory stimulation in songbirds.

Authors:  Lisbeth Van Ruijssevelt; Geert De Groof; Anne Van der Kant; Colline Poirier; Johan Van Audekerke; Marleen Verhoye; Annemie Van der Linden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Frank Beach Award Winner: Steroids as neuromodulators of brain circuits and behavior.

Authors:  Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  Noninvasive diffusive optical imaging of the auditory response to birdsong in the zebra finch.

Authors:  James V Lee; Edward L Maclin; Kathy A Low; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani; David F Clayton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Own-song recognition in the songbird auditory pathway: selectivity and lateralization.

Authors:  Colline Poirier; Tiny Boumans; Marleen Verhoye; Jacques Balthazart; Annemie Van der Linden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Investigation of musicality in birdsong.

Authors:  David Rothenberg; Tina C Roeske; Henning U Voss; Marc Naguib; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Sparse and background-invariant coding of vocalizations in auditory scenes.

Authors:  David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Single Neurons in the Avian Auditory Cortex Encode Individual Identity and Propagation Distance in Naturally Degraded Communication Calls.

Authors:  Solveig C Mouterde; Julie E Elie; Nicolas Mathevon; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Functional MRI of auditory responses in the zebra finch forebrain reveals a hierarchical organisation based on signal strength but not selectivity.

Authors:  Tiny Boumans; Sharon M H Gobes; Colline Poirier; Frederic E Theunissen; Liesbeth Vandersmissen; Wouter Pintjens; Marleen Verhoye; Johan J Bolhuis; Annemie Van der Linden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Auditory evoked BOLD responses in awake compared to lightly anaesthetized zebra finches.

Authors:  L Van Ruijssevelt; J Hamaide; M T Van Gurp; M Verhoye; A Van der Linden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.