Literature DB >> 17880948

Redefining in vitro fertilization success: should triplets be considered failures?

Lawrence Grunfeld1, Martha Luna, Tanmoy Mukherjee, Benjamin Sandler, Yui Nagashima, Alan B Copperman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how the ranking of IVF programs changes if high-order multiple pregnancies (HOMPs) are considered negative outcomes.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: The 2004 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System. PATIENT(S): Two hundred seven programs that performed >50 IVF cycles were analyzed, and only patients <or=35 years of age were included. INTERVENTION(S): Program size, success rate, and number of embryos transferred were recorded for each program. All programs were ranked in accordance to these variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The programs were re-ranked after considering HOMPs as negative, rather than as positive, outcomes. RESULT(S): High-order multiple pregnancies were more abundant as the number of embryos replaced increased. The live birth rate, after excluding HOMPs, significantly decreased as the number of embryos transferred increased. The lowest ranked programs performed transfers with the greatest number of embryos (2.4-4.5). After HOMP exclusion, the rank of programs that transferred >2.4 embryos decreased, as opposed to the programs that transferred fewer embryos (1.8-2.4). CONCLUSION(S): Reclassifying HOMPs as failed cycles will result in a reduced rank in programs that maintain high embryo replacements. Redefining success as a singleton or twin birth significantly changes the ranking order of programs and, potentially, how programs are perceived.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17880948     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Endometrial receptivity defects during IVF cycles with and without letrozole.

Authors:  Paul B Miller; Brent A Parnell; Greta Bushnell; Nicholas Tallman; David A Forstein; H Lee Higdon; Jo Kitawaki; Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Mark D Hornstein; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Aaron K Styer; Barbara Luke; Wendy Vitek; Mindy S Christianson; Valerie L Baker; Alicia Y Christy; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.