Literature DB >> 17880484

Overcoming health inequalities by using the Bug Busting 'whole-school approach' to eradicate head lice.

Joanna Ibarra1, Frances Fry, Wickenden Clarice, Alice Olsen, Robert H Vander Stichele, Hilde Lapeere, Jenner Maryan, Andrea Franks, Jane L Smith.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was to illustrate the socially inclusive nature of the Bug Busting 'whole-school approach' to head louse eradication.
BACKGROUND: In the UK, Belgium and Denmark, persistent head lice in families of all socio-economic status (SES) is a problem. Since 1995 in the UK and 1998 elsewhere, an educational programme intended to teach families how to detect and treat head lice by using the Bug Busting wet combing method has been organized in some areas. Local schools lead this community strategy for prevention, known as a 'whole-school approach' (UK). DESIGN AND METHODS: We describe five studies applying the Bug Busting approach, four set in districts where some disadvantaged families live (UK and Belgium) and a fifth set in Denmark. Feasibility and consumer satisfaction are examined. One UK study analyses data on area prescribing for head lice and the impact in a deprived locality of raising the profile of Bug Busting.
RESULTS: We find parental education in Bug Busting enables families of all SES to participate in a 'whole-school approach' to head lice. Best results are obtained when each family has a Bug Buster Kit. This provides all the combs necessary with full instructions on their use with ordinary shampoo and conditioner to detect lice, eradicate an infestation mechanically, or to check the success of any treatment. In the UK, the promotion of the Bug Busting approach is reducing primary care expenditure on treatment for head lice and professional time spent with worried parents. As a result, healthcare providers can give time to the few families who require one-to-one guidance. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Incorporation of the Bug Busting approach to head lice into clinical practice in school communities contributes to sustainable control whilst overcoming health inequalities in participating families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17880484     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01795.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  8 in total

1.  Ex vivo effectiveness of French over-the-counter products against head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis De Geer, 1778).

Authors:  Catherine Combescot-Lang; Robert H Vander Stichele; Berthine Toubate; Emilie Veirron; Kosta Y Mumcuoglu
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Head Lice at School: Traditional Medicine and Community Engagement.

Authors:  Renata Campos Nogueira; Fabiana Regina Nonato; Maria Cristina Duchene Veauvy; Anne-Laure Cavin; Marwah Al-Anbaki; Bertrand Graz
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  Head lice in Norwegian households: actions taken, costs and knowledge.

Authors:  Bjørn Arne Rukke; Tone Birkemoe; Arnulf Soleng; Heidi Heggen Lindstedt; Preben Ottesen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial.

Authors:  Ian F Burgess; Christine M Brown; Pat Nair
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-07-10

5.  Head lice predictors and infestation dynamics among primary school children in Norway.

Authors:  Tone Birkemoe; Heidi Heggen Lindstedt; Preben Ottesen; Arnulf Soleng; Øyvind Næss; Bjørn Arne Rukke
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Impact of theory-based educational intervention on explaining preventive pediculosis infestation behavior among primary school students.

Authors:  Robab Sharifat; Hashem Mohamadian; Maria Cheragi; Amal Saki Malehi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-04-25

7.  Treatment of head lice with dimeticone 4% lotion: comparison of two formulations in a randomised controlled trial in rural Turkey.

Authors:  Ozgür Kurt; I Cüneyt Balcioğlu; Ian F Burgess; M Emin Limoncu; Nogay Girginkardeşler; Tuba Tabak; Hasan Muslu; Ozge Ermiş; M Turhan Sahin; Cemal Bilac; Hakan Kavur; Yusuf Ozbel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  International recommendations for an effective control of head louse infestations.

Authors:  Kosta Y Mumcuoglu; Richard J Pollack; David L Reed; Stephen C Barker; Shirley Gordon; Ariel C Toloza; Maria I Picollo; Aysegul Taylan-Ozkan; Olivier Chosidow; Birgit Habedank; Joanna Ibarra; Terri L Meinking; Robert H Vander Stichele
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.736

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.