Literature DB >> 1788036

Duration of visible persistence in relation to stimulus complexity.

D E Irwin1, J M Yeomans.   

Abstract

Visible persistence refers to the phenomenal impression that a stimulus is still present after its offset. A dispute exists whether visible persistence is due to temporal sluggishness in the visual pathway (neural hypothesis) or whether it is a byproduct of information-extraction processes under cognitive control (process hypothesis). This was investigated by manipulating stimulus complexity in five temporal integration experiments and one recognition memory experiment. According to the process hypothesis, complex stimuli should persist longer than simple stimuli because they require more information extraction. This prediction was not confirmed; in all six experiments, complexity was found to have no reliable effect on the duration of visible persistence. By contrast, and in accordance with earlier findings, complexity was shown to have a significant effect on a short-lived, nonvisible form of memory known as schematic persistenc. This pattern of results supports two major conclusions: First, that the effects of complexity reported in earlier research were probably on schematic--rather than visible--persistence; and second, that visible persistence must be regarded as a residual neural trace of an extinguished stimulus, rather than as a byproduct of information-extraction processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1788036     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  26 in total

1.  The extraction of information from visual persistence.

Authors:  D E Erwin
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1976-12

2.  The two-transient (masking) paradigm.

Authors:  E Matin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The phenomenology of spatial integration: data and models.

Authors:  G R Loftus; A M Hanna
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Suppression of visible persistence as a function of spatial separation between inducing stimuli.

Authors:  V Di Lollo; J H Hogben
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-04

5.  Persisting arguments about visual persistence: reply to Long.

Authors:  D E Irwin; J M Yeomans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-03

6.  Visual persistence as measured by reaction time.

Authors:  G G Briggs; M Kinsbourne
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  The varieties of visual persistence: comments on Yeomans and Irwin.

Authors:  G M Long
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-10

8.  On the relationship between stimulus intensity and duration of visible persistence.

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Quantitative and structural factors in the judgment of pattern complexity.

Authors:  S Ichikawa
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-08

10.  Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J F Collins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Apparent duration and spatial structure.

Authors:  J Hughes; J R Lishman; D M Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

2.  The integration window for shape cues is a function of ambient illumination.

Authors:  Ernest Greene
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.759

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.