Literature DB >> 17879773

Quantitative characterization of metastatic disease in the spine. Part I. Semiautomated segmentation using atlas-based deformable registration and the level set method.

M Hardisty1, L Gordon, P Agarwal, T Skrinskas, C Whyne.   

Abstract

Quantitative assessment of metastatic disease in bone is often considered immeasurable and, as such, patients with skeletal metastases are often excluded from clinical trials. In order to effectively quantify the impact of metastatic tumor involvement in the spine, accurate segmentation of the vertebra is required. Manual segmentation can be accurate but involves extensive and time-consuming user interaction. Potential solutions to automating segmentation of metastatically involved vertebrae are demons deformable image registration and level set methods. The purpose of this study was to develop a semiautomated method to accurately segment tumor-bearing vertebrae using the aforementioned techniques. By maintaining morphology of an atlas, the demons-level set composite algorithm was able to accurately differentiate between trans-cortical tumors and surrounding soft tissue of identical intensity. The algorithm successfully segmented both the vertebral body and trabecular centrum of tumor-involved and healthy vertebrae. This work validates our approach as equivalent in accuracy to an experienced user.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879773     DOI: 10.1118/1.2746498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Acetabular orientation: anatomical and functional measurement.

Authors:  Omri Lubovsky; David Wright; Michael Hardisty; Alex Kiss; Hans Kreder; Cari Whyne
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  High precision semiautomated computed tomography measurement of lumbar disk and vertebral heights.

Authors:  Sovira Tan; Jianhua Yao; Lawrence Yao; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Inter-rater reliability between musculoskeletal radiologists and orthopedic surgeons on computed tomography imaging features of spinal metastases.

Authors:  L Khan; G Mitera; L Probyn; M Ford; M Christakis; J Finkelstein; A Donovan; L Zhang; L Zeng; J Rubenstein; A Yee; L Holden; E Chow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Evaluation of whole-body MR to CT deformable image registration.

Authors:  A Akbarzadeh; D Gutierrez; A Baskin; M R Ay; A Ahmadian; N Riahi Alam; K O Lövblad; H Zaidi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  An optimized process flow for rapid segmentation of cortical bones of the craniofacial skeleton using the level-set method.

Authors:  T D Szwedowski; J Fialkov; A Pakdel; C M Whyne
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Radiological changes following second-line zoledronic acid treatment in breast cancer patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  E Amir; C Whyne; O C Freedman; M Fralick; R Kumar; M Hardisty; M Clemons
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Automated CT-based analysis to detect changes in the prevalence of lytic bone metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  T Skrinskas; M Clemons; O Freedman; I Weller; C M Whyne
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 8.  Biomechanical Properties of Metastatically Involved Osteolytic Bone.

Authors:  Cari M Whyne; Dallis Ferguson; Allison Clement; Mohammedayaz Rangrez; Michael Hardisty
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.