Literature DB >> 1787947

A new test for the evaluation of disability glare.

I L Bailey1, M A Bullimore.   

Abstract

We describe a new glare test that uses low contrast letters and a variable surround glare source. The test is easy to administer clinically and all test targets, luminance levels, glare geometry, and viewing conditions are well controlled. We found the most useful index of disability glare to be the difference in visual acuity scores for the low contrast chart in the no-glare and high-glare conditions and refer to this as the disability glare index (DGI). We tested a group of normal subjects who were divided into younger (age 15 to 41 years) and older (age 50 to 82 years) groups. The mean DGI value for the older group (10.2 +/- 4.8) was significantly higher than that for the younger group (2.3 +/- 1.9). The DGI is a better discriminator between the two groups than either high or low contrast visual acuity. We attribute the significantly higher DGI values in the older group to increased intraocular light scatter. We find DGI is poorly correlated with high contrast visual acuity (r = 0.33). Our findings suggest that this test of disability glare is sensitive to relatively modest changes in the ocular media. It is a potentially useful tool in detection and assessment of subtle media disturbances and in monitoring changes in the ocular media over a period of time.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1787947     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199112000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  15 in total

1.  Non-standard vision measures predict mortality in elders: the Smith-Kettlewell Institute (SKI) study.

Authors:  Lori A Lott; Marilyn E Schneck; Gunilla Haegerström-Portnoy; John A Brabyn
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.648

2.  Glare sensitivity and visual acuity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

Authors:  U Niesen; U Businger; P Hartmann; P Senn; I Schipper
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Monocular vs. binocular measurement of spatial vision in elders.

Authors:  Marilyn E Schneck; Gunilla Haegerstöm-Portnoy; Lori A Lott; John A Brabyn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Improvements in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability after first and second eye cataract surgery.

Authors:  D B Elliott; A Patla; M A Bullimore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Bilateral cataract surgery and driving performance.

Authors:  J M Wood; T P Carberry
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  R K Parrish
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1996

7.  Age-related changes in functional visual acuity in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Minako Kaido; Ikuko Toda; Reiko Ishida; Mototaka Konagai; Murat Dogru; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Early age-related macular degeneration impairs tolerance to stimulus degradation.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Janis White
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Pupil dilatation does affect some aspects of daytime driving performance.

Authors:  J M Wood; D Garth; G Grounds; P McKay; A Mulvahil
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  N-Acetylcarnosine sustained drug delivery eye drops to control the signs of ageless vision: glare sensitivity, cataract amelioration and quality of vision currently available treatment for the challenging 50,000-patient population.

Authors:  Mark A Babizhayev; Leslie Burke; Philip Micans; Stuart P Richer
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.