Literature DB >> 17879198

The scaling of abundance in consumers and their resources: implications for the energy equivalence rule.

Chris Carbone1, J Marcus Rowcliffe, Guy Cowlishaw, Nick J B Isaac.   

Abstract

The negative scaling of plant and animal abundance with body mass is one of the most fundamental relationships in ecology. However, theoretical approaches to explain this phenomenon make the unrealistic assumption that species share a homogeneous resource. Here we present a simple model linking mass and metabolism with density that includes the effects of consumer size on resource characteristics (particle size, density, and distribution). We predict patterns consistent with the energy equivalence rule (EER) under some scenarios. However, deviations from EER occur as a result of variation in resource distribution and productivity (e.g., due to the clumping of prey or variation in food particle size selection). We also predict that abundance scaling exponents change with the dimensionality of the foraging habitat. Our model predictions explain several inconsistencies in the observed scaling of vertebrate abundance among ecological and taxonomic groups and provide a broad framework for understanding variation in abundance.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879198     DOI: 10.1086/519858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

1.  Taxonomic variation in size-density relationships challenges the notion of energy equivalence.

Authors:  Nick J B Isaac; David Storch; Chris Carbone
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Space-use scaling and home range overlap in primates.

Authors:  Fiona Pearce; Chris Carbone; Guy Cowlishaw; Nick J B Isaac
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Determinants and consequences of interspecific body size variation in tetraphyllidean tapeworms.

Authors:  Haseeb Sajjad Randhawa; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Geometric factors influencing the diet of vertebrate predators in marine and terrestrial environments.

Authors:  Chris Carbone; Daryl Codron; Conrad Scofield; Marcus Clauss; Jon Bielby
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 5.  Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi-species comparison.

Authors:  Tim R Hofmeester; Joris P G M Cromsigt; John Odden; Henrik Andrén; Jonas Kindberg; John D C Linnell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Energy in-equivalence in Australian marsupials: evidence for disruption of the continent's mammal assemblage, or are rules meant to be broken?

Authors:  Adam J Munn; Craig Dunne; Dennis W H Müller; Marcus Clauss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.