Literature DB >> 17878777

The healing forearm fracture: a matched comparison of forearm refractures.

Avi C Baitner1, Andrew Perry, Francois D Lalonde, Tracey P Bastrom, Jeff Pawelek, Peter O Newton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Forearm fractures in children usually heal rapidly after closed treatment. Recent studies report forearm refracture rates of 5%. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for refracture based on radiographic variables.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients that sustained a second forearm fracture (refracture) between 1998 and 2005. Refractures were defined as having a second fracture of the same forearm within 18 months of the original fracture. A comparison group of single-fracture patients followed in a capitated insurance plan were included and matched based on age and sex. Radiographic assessment included initial/final angulation, displacement, and fracture-line visibility at latest follow-up.
RESULTS: Sixty-three refractures were compared with 132 age- and sex-matched single-fracture patients. Time to refracture averaged 10 months. Thirty-eight percent of the initial fractures in the refracture group occurred in the proximal or middle third of the forearm compared with 15% for the single-fracture patients (P < 0.001). Because location of the fracture was found to be a risk factor for refracture, a secondary analysis was performed with refracture patients matched to single-fracture patients based on age, sex, bone fractured, fracture location, and treatment method. Fracture-line visibility of the radius at latest follow-up was clearly visible in 48% of refractures compared with 21% of controls (P = 0.05). Initial fracture severity and residual deformity were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal and middle one third forearm fractures are at greater risk of refracture compared with distal one third forearm fractures. There was a trend toward incomplete healing seen more commonly in those that refractured, emphasizing the importance of longer immobilization in these fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III, case-control study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17878777     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318142568c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  5 in total

1.  Rapid remineralization of the distal radius after forearm fracture in children.

Authors:  Ellen B Fung; Marcie L Humphrey; Ginny Gildengorin; Natalie Goldstein; Scott A Hoffinger
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Clinical and financial impacts of flexible intramedullary nailing in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: A case-control study.

Authors:  Aline Leuba; Dimitri Ceroni; Anne Tabard-Fougère; Nicolas Lutz
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.917

3.  Risk factors for refracture of the forearm in children treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Bingqiang Han; Zhigang Wang; Yuchan Li; Yunlan Xu; Haiqing Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Is there a standard treatment for displaced pediatric diametaphyseal forearm fractures?: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.

Authors:  Rainer Kubiak; Devrim Aksakal; Christel Weiss; Lucas M Wessel; Bettina Lange
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union.

Authors:  Turan Bilge Kizkapan; Abdulhamit Misir; Sinan Oguzkaya; Mustafa Ozcamdalli; Erdal Uzun; Gokhan Sayer
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2021-01-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.