Literature DB >> 17878438

Molting in Salmonella Enteritidis-challenged laying hens fed alfalfa crumbles. II. Fermentation and microbial ecology response.

K D Dunkley1, J L McReynolds, M E Hume, C S Dunkley, T R Callaway, L F Kubena, D J Nisbet, S C Ricke.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine microbial population shifts and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) responses in the gastrointestinal tract of Salmonella Enteritidis-challenged molted and nonmolted hens fed different dietary regimens. Fifteen Salmonella-free Single Comb Leghorn hens (>50 wk old) were assigned to 3 treatment groups of 5 birds each based on diet in 2 trials: 100% alfalfa crumbles (ALC), full-fed (FF, nonmolted) 100% commercial layer ration, and feed withdrawal (FW). A forced molt was induced by either a 12-d alfalfa diet or FW. In all treatment groups, each hen was challenged by crop gavage orally 4 d after molt induction with a 1-mL inoculum containing 10(6) cfu of Salmonella Enteritidis. Fecal and cecal samples (d 4, 6, 8, 11, and necropsy on d 12) were collected postchallenge. Microbial population shifts were evaluated by PCR-based 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and SCFA concentrations were measured. Total SCFA in fecal and cecal contents for FW molted hens were generally lower (P < or = 0.05) in the later stages of the molt period when compared to ALC and FF treatment groups. The overall trend of SCFA in cecal and fecal samples exhibited similar patterns. In trials 1 and 2, hens molted with ALC diet generally yielded more similar amplicon band patterns with the FF hens in both fecal and cecal samples by the end of the molting period than with FW hens. The results of these studies suggest that ALC molted hens supported microflora and fermentation activities, which were more comparable to FF hens than FW hens by the end of the molting period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17878438     DOI: 10.1093/ps/86.10.2101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

Review 1.  Population dynamics of Salmonella enterica serotypes in commercial egg and poultry production.

Authors:  Steven L Foley; Rajesh Nayak; Irene B Hanning; Timothy J Johnson; Jing Han; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars.

Authors:  Steven L Foley; Timothy J Johnson; Steven C Ricke; Rajesh Nayak; Jessica Danzeisen
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Development of rapid detection and genetic characterization of salmonella in poultry breeder feeds.

Authors:  Robin Jarquin; Irene Hanning; Soohyoun Ahn; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Applications of Microbiome Analyses in Alternative Poultry Broiler Production Systems.

Authors:  Zhaohao Shi; Michael J Rothrock; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-05-24

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal microbiomes of broilers and layer hens in alternative production systems.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke; Michael J Rothrock
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Temporal Dynamics of Cloacal Microbiota in Adult Laying Chickens With and Without Access to an Outdoor Range.

Authors:  Janneke Schreuder; Francisca C Velkers; Alex Bossers; Ruth J Bouwstra; Willem F de Boer; Pim van Hooft; J Arjan Stegeman; Stephanie D Jurburg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Microbiome applications for laying hen performance and egg production.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke; Dana K Dittoe; Elena G Olson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 8.  Application of microbial analyses to feeds and potential implications for poultry nutrition.

Authors:  Elena G Olson; Dana K Dittoe; Joshua A Jendza; David A Stock; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.014

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.