Literature DB >> 17878273

The value of DNA paternity identification in beef cattle: examples from Nevada's free-range ranches.

L Gomez-Raya1, K Priest, W M Rauw, M Okomo-Adhiambo, D Thain, B Bruce, A Rink, R Torell, L Grellman, R Narayanan, C W Beattie.   

Abstract

The feasibility and economic value of DNA paternity identification were investigated and illustrated using Nevada beef cattle operations. A panel of 15 microsatellites was genotyped in 2,196 animals from 8 ranches with a total of 31,571 genotypes. Probabilities of exclusion for each marker within ranch and across ranches were computed. Joint probabilities of exclusion for the 15 microsatellites were also determined, resulting in values over 0.99 for any individual ranch and across ranches. Dropping 1 or 2 microsatellites with the lowest probabilities of exclusion resulted in joint probabilities greater than 0.99 and with marginal reduction compared with the probabilities with 15 microsatellites. Formulas for benefit-cost analysis for a DNA paternity identification program in beef cattle were derived. Genotyping 15 microsatellites with 20 calves per sire resulted in benefits of $1.71 and $2.44 per dollar invested at bull culling rates of 0.20 and 0.30, respectively. The breakpoints for the program to be profitable occurred when the ratio of the price of 1 kg of calf liveweight over the cost of genotyping 1 microsatellite was greater than 1.1 for a bull culling rate of 0.30. Benefit-cost analysis was also derived under incomplete DNA paternity identification using a lower number of DNA markers than necessary to achieve joint probabilities of exclusion of 0.99. Approximately a 20% increase in the benefit-cost ratio was achieved using 10 vs. 12 microsatellites with incomplete paternity identification. The greater the number of bulls in the operation, the lower the benefit-cost ratio of the paternity testing program. Low probabilities of exclusion and a high number of bulls in the beef operation reduced the benefit-cost ratio dramatically. The DNA paternity identification programs are feasible and may be profitable for free-range beef cattle operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17878273     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Application of DNA markers in parentage verification of Boran cattle in Kenya.

Authors:  David Kios; Estè van Marle-Köster; Carina Visser
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Implementation of a parentage control system in Portuguese beef-cattle with a panel of microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Inês Carolino; Conceição O Sousa; Sónia Ferreira; Nuno Carolino; Fátima S Silva; Luís T Gama
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.771

3.  First-degree relationships and genotyping errors deciphered by a high-density SNP array in a Duroc × Iberian pig cross.

Authors:  L Gomez-Raya; E Gómez Izquierdo; E de Mercado de la Peña; F Garcia-Ruiz; W M Rauw
Journal:  BMC Genom Data       Date:  2022-02-17

4.  Imputation of microsatellite alleles from dense SNP genotypes for parental verification.

Authors:  Matthew McClure; Tad Sonstegard; George Wiggans; Curtis P Van Tassell
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 4.599

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.