C O Chigbu1, G C Iloabachie. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. chchigbu@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence, aetiology and outcomes of caesarean section refusal in pregnant women. DESIGN: A prospective controlled study. SETTING: University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital and Aghaeze Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. POPULATION: A total of 62 Nigerian women who declined elective caesarean section. METHOD: Interviewer-administered questionnaires at the time of caesarean section refusal and postdelivery. The delivery outcomes of the subjects were compared with that of a matched control group of women who accepted caesarean section. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence, maternal reasons for caesarean section refusal and the resultant maternal and perinatal mortality. RESULTS: The prevalence of caesarean section refusal was 11.6% of all caesarean deliveries. Maternal reasons for refusing caesarean section include fear of death, economic reasons, desire to experience vaginal delivery and inadequate counselling. Outcomes were significantly worse among women who refused elective caesarean section than in the controls with a maternal mortality of 15% (versus 2%, P = 0.008) and a perinatal mortality of 34% (versus 5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of caesarean section refusal in south-eastern Nigeria. Women declining caesareans have very poor maternal and perinatal outcomes and need extra support.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence, aetiology and outcomes of caesarean section refusal in pregnant women. DESIGN: A prospective controlled study. SETTING: University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital and Aghaeze Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. POPULATION: A total of 62 Nigerian women who declined elective caesarean section. METHOD: Interviewer-administered questionnaires at the time of caesarean section refusal and postdelivery. The delivery outcomes of the subjects were compared with that of a matched control group of women who accepted caesarean section. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence, maternal reasons for caesarean section refusal and the resultant maternal and perinatal mortality. RESULTS: The prevalence of caesarean section refusal was 11.6% of all caesarean deliveries. Maternal reasons for refusing caesarean section include fear of death, economic reasons, desire to experience vaginal delivery and inadequate counselling. Outcomes were significantly worse among women who refused elective caesarean section than in the controls with a maternal mortality of 15% (versus 2%, P = 0.008) and a perinatal mortality of 34% (versus 5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of caesarean section refusal in south-eastern Nigeria. Women declining caesareans have very poor maternal and perinatal outcomes and need extra support.
Authors: Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Mahrukh Ayesha Ali; Mohammad Usman Ali; Aamer Imdad; Joy E Lawn; Nynke Van Den Broek; Zulfiqar A Bhutta Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Anna Kemp; Fatima A Haggar; Rachael E Moorin; Anthony S Gunnell; David B Preen; Fiona J Stanley; C D'Arcy J Holman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Fatima Haggar; Gavin Pereira; Helen Leonard; Nick de Klerk; Fiona J Stanley; Sarah Stock Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 2.692