Literature DB >> 17877596

Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.

Anish Keepanasseril1, Vanita Suri, Rashmi Bagga, Neelam Aggarwal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of ultrasonographic cervical assessment with Bishop score before induction of labour in predicting the success of labour induction in nulliparous women.
METHODS: This is a prospective study conducted in 138 women who underwent cervical assessment with transvaginal sonography followed by digital cervical assessment using Bishop score before induction of labour. Ultrasonographic parameters evaluated were cervical length, posterior cervical angle and funnelling were blinded to the managing physicians. Statistical analysis was carried out using Mann-Whitney test, chi2 test, receiver operating characteristics curves and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Induction of labour was successful in 106 (76.8%) of the women. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated cervical length and posterior cervical angle assessed by transvaginal sonography as independent predictors of successful outcome after induction of labour. Neither Bishop score nor its individual parameters were found to be significant in the regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for cervical length and posterior cervical angle was greater than that of the Bishop score in predicting a successful labour induction. The best cut-off point for the parameters in receiver operating characteristics curve was 3.0 cm for cervical length and 100 degrees for posterior cervical angle. Cervical length of 3.0 cm had a sensitivity of 84.9%, and a specificity of 90.6% and a posterior cervical angle of 100 degrees with 65% and 72%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and posterior cervical angle is better than conventional Bishop score in predicting successful labour induction in nulliparous women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17877596     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00762.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  6 in total

1.  Manipal Cervical Scoring System by Transvaginal Ultrasound in Predicting Successful Labour Induction.

Authors:  Neha Bajpai; Rajesh Bhakta; Pratap Kumar; Lavanya Rai; Shripad Hebbar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 2.  Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.

Authors:  Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu; Ahizechukwu C Eke; George U Eleje; Chukwuemeka E Nwachukwu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-12

3.  [The opening of the internal cervical os predicts cervical ripening better than Bishop's score in nulliparous women at 41 weeks gestation].

Authors:  Mehdi Kehila; Hassine Saber Abouda; Rim Ben Hmid; Omar Touhami; Cyrine Ben Miled; Imen Godcha; Sami Mahjoub; Mohamed Badis Chanoufi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-11-29

4.  Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Zainab Hananah Abang Abdullah; Kah Teik Chew; V Ramesh V Velayudham; Zainab Yahaya; Amilia Afzan Mohd Jamil; Muhammad Azrai Abu; Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani; Nor Azlin Mohamed Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Value of Posterior Cervical Angle as a Predictor of Vaginal Delivery: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Eun-Ju Kim; Ji-Man Heo; Ho-Yeon Kim; Ki-Hoon Ahn; Geum-Joon Cho; Soon-Cheol Hong; Min-Jeong Oh; Nak-Woo Lee; Hai-Joong Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-25

6.  Assessment of Uterocervical Angle Width as a Predictive Factor of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  George Daskalakis; Marianna Theodora; Panagiotis Antsaklis; Michael Sindos; Themistoklis Grigoriadis; Aris Antsaklis; Nikolaos Papantoniou; Dimitrios Loutradis; Vasilios Pergialiotis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.