Literature DB >> 17877229

Comparative study of LDL-cholesterol levels in Thai patients by the direct method and using the Friedewald formula.

Thirawuth Teerakanchana1, Wilai Puavilai, Kanjana Suriyaprom, Rungsunn Tungtrongchitr.   

Abstract

In this study, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by direct measurement and estimation using the Friedewald formula, were compared among 1,016 Thai patients. The study assessed blood samples from out-patients sent to the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, Rajvithi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, for measurement of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels, January 2004-December 2005. Patients' ages ranged 8-89 years, 573 (56.4%) were females. Linear regression analysis showed the two methods had highly significant correlation coefficients (p<0.001). Upon comparing the two methods, at TG levels of 151-200 mg/dl, bias was 18.3 mg/dl; and for TG levels of 201-300 mg/dl, bias was lower at 11.4 mg/dl; for TG levels of 301-400 mg/dl, bias increased to 20.9 mg/dl. The direct assay meets currently established analytical performance targets and may be useful for the diagnosis and management of hyperlipidemic patients. The Friedewald formula did not give a homogeneous performance when estimating LDL-C levels in samples with different TG levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17877229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health        ISSN: 0125-1562            Impact factor:   0.267


  8 in total

1.  Derivation of a Modified Friedewald's equation for LDL cholesterol estimation in Sub-Himalayan population: A comparative study.

Authors:  Parmila Dudi; Shashi Ranjan Mani Yadav; Poonam Sharma; Prashant Kumar; Anissa A Mirza; Manisha Naithani; Satyavati Rana; Bela Goyal
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-05-14

2.  Comparison and Validation of 10 Equations Including a Novel Method for Estimation of LDL-cholesterol in a 168,212 Asian Population.

Authors:  John Hoon Rim; Yong-Ho Lee; Myung Ha Lee; Ha Yan Kim; Jiin Choi; Byung-Wan Lee; Eun Seok Kang; Hyun Chul Lee; Jeong-Ho Kim; Sang-Guk Lee; Bong-Soo Cha
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Comparison of calculated versus directly-measured low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol: An evaluation of ten formulas for an HIV-positive population in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Ifeyinwa Osegbe; Martin Ugonabo; Chinwe Chukwuka; Ijeoma Meka; Nnamdi Nwosu
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  Correlation of Friedewald's calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Nanda; M Bharathy; Asha Dinakaran; Lopamudra Ray; K Ravichandran
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

5.  Correlations between Direct and Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Measurements in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Sultan Alouffi; Mohd Wajid Ali Khan; Nawaf Alotabi; Amal Alsuggyair; Ikram Alhassan; Ibrahim Al Alwan; Esam Al Banyan; Yasmin A Al-Twaijri; Hani Tamim; Fahad Al-Hussein; Salih Aljasser; Hanan Alfwaz; Waleed Tamimi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Clinical Validation of Eleven Formulas for Calculating LDL-C in Iran.

Authors:  Fereshteh Atabi; Reza Mohammadi
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2020-07-18

7.  Validation of multiple equations for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Korean adults.

Authors:  Rihwa Choi; Mi-Jung Park; Youngju Oh; Sung Ho Kim; Sang Gon Lee; Eun Hee Lee
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Comparison of various formulae for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by a combination of ages and genders in Taiwanese adults.

Authors:  Chung-Huang Tsai; Hsin-Hung Wu; Shao-Jen Weng
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.