Literature DB >> 17876070

Safety of 6-Hz primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke.

James R Carey1, Chad D Evans, David C Anderson, Ela Bhatt, Ashima Nagpal, Teresa J Kimberley, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suppression of activity in the contralesional motor cortex may promote recovery of function after stroke. Furthermore, the known depressant effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be increased and prolonged by preceding it with 6-Hz priming stimulation.
OBJECTIVE: The authors explored the safety of 6-Hz primed low-frequency rTMS in 10 patients with ischemic stroke.
METHODS: Priming consisted of 10 minutes of 6-Hz rTMS applied to the contralesional hemisphere at 90% of resting motor threshold delivered in 2 trains/min with 5 s/train and 25-second intervals between trains. Low-frequency rTMS consisted of an additional 10 minutes of 1-Hz rTMS at 90% of resting motor threshold without interruption. Possible adverse effects were assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III), the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II), a finger movement tracking test, and individual self-assessments. Pretest, treatment, and posttest occurred on the first day with follow-up tests on the next 5 weekdays.
RESULTS: There were no seizures and no impairment of NIHSS, WAIS-III, or BDI-II scores. Transient impairment occurred on the HVLT-R. Transient tiredness was common. Occasional reports of headache, neck pain, increased sleep, reduced sleep, nausea, and anxiety occurred.
CONCLUSION: Because there were no major adverse effects, the authors concluded that the treatment was safe for the individuals in this study and that further investigation is now warranted to examine efficacy and safety of serial treatments of 6-Hz primed low-frequency rTMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17876070     DOI: 10.1177/1545968307305458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  22 in total

Review 1.  Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Rebecca F Gottesman; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Priming the brain to capitalize on metaplasticity in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Bernadette T Gillick; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08-15

4.  Serial treatments of primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke: characteristics of responders vs. nonresponders.

Authors:  James R Carey; Huiqiong Deng; Bernadette T Gillick; Jessica M Cassidy; David C Anderson; Lei Zhang; William Thomas
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Focal hand dystonia: individualized intervention with repeated application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Teresa Jacobson Kimberley; Michael R Borich; Rebekah L Schmidt; James R Carey; Bernadette Gillick
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 7.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

8.  Neural correlates of the antinociceptive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on central pain after stroke.

Authors:  Suk Hoon Ohn; Won Hyuk Chang; Chang-Hyun Park; Sung Tae Kim; Jung Il Lee; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Yun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Combined rTMS and virtual reality brain-computer interface training for motor recovery after stroke.

Authors:  N N Johnson; J Carey; B J Edelman; A Doud; A Grande; K Lakshminarayan; B He
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review.

Authors:  Sergei V Adamovich; Gerard G Fluet; Eugene Tunik; Alma S Merians
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.