Literature DB >> 17876024

Glycemic control and type 2 diabetes mellitus: the optimal hemoglobin A1c targets. A guidance statement from the American College of Physicians.

Amir Qaseem1, Sandeep Vijan, Vincenza Snow, J Thomas Cross, Kevin B Weiss, Douglas K Owens.   

Abstract

This guidance statement is derived from other organizations' guidelines and is based on an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the available guidelines. We used the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) appraisal instrument to evaluate the guidelines from various organizations. On the basis of the review of the available guidelines, we recommend: STATEMENT 1: To prevent microvascular complications of diabetes, the goal for glycemic control should be as low as is feasible without undue risk for adverse events or an unacceptable burden on patients. Treatment goals should be based on a discussion of the benefits and harms of specific levels of glycemic control with the patient. A hemoglobin A1c level less than 7% based on individualized assessment is a reasonable goal for many but not all patients. STATEMENT 2: The goal for hemoglobin A1c level should be based on individualized assessment of risk for complications from diabetes, comorbidity, life expectancy, and patient preferences. STATEMENT 3: We recommend further research to assess the optimal level of glycemic control, particularly in the presence of comorbid conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17876024     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-6-200709180-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  38 in total

1.  Citizenship and health insurance status predict glycemic management: NHANES data 2007-2016.

Authors:  Eileen R Chasens; Monica Dinardo; Christopher C Imes; Jonna L Morris; Betty Braxter; Kyeongra Yang
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Guidelines: we'll always need them, we sometimes dislike them, and we have to make them better.

Authors:  R Kahn
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Associations between health care factors and self-reported health status among individuals with diabetes: results from a community assessment.

Authors:  Justin B Dickerson; Matthew L Smith; SangNam Ahn; Marcia G Ory
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-04

4.  Severe Hypoglycemia Requiring Medical Intervention in a Large Cohort of Adults With Diabetes Receiving Care in U.S. Integrated Health Care Delivery Systems: 2005-2011.

Authors:  Ram D Pathak; Emily B Schroeder; Elizabeth R Seaquist; Chan Zeng; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Abraham Thomas; Jay Desai; Beth Waitzfelder; Gregory A Nichols; Jean M Lawrence; Andrew J Karter; John F Steiner; Jodi Segal; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Inadequate control of diabetes and metabolic indices among diabetic patients: A population based study from the Kerman Coronary Artery Disease Risk Study (KERCADRS).

Authors:  Gholamreza Yousefzadeh; Mostafa Shokoohi; Hamid Najafipour
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-12-23

6.  Pharmacoepidemiology of insulin initiation in diabetes care.

Authors:  Leonard M Pogach
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Pioglitazone and cardiovascular risk in T2DM patients: is it good for all?

Authors:  Muhammad Abdul-Ghani; Amin Jayyous; Nidal Asaad; Sherif Helmy; Jassim Al-Suwaidi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

8.  Glycemic control and extended hemodialysis survival in patients with diabetes mellitus: comparative results of traditional and time-dependent Cox model analyses.

Authors:  Mark E Williams; Eduardo Lacson; Weiling Wang; J Michael Lazarus; Raymond Hakim
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  Do clinical standards for diabetes care address excess risk for hypoglycemia in vulnerable patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  Seth A Berkowitz; Katherine Aragon; Jonas Hines; Hilary Seligman; Sei Lee; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  The systematic guideline review: method, rationale, and test on chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Christiane Muth; Jochen Gensichen; Martin Beyer; Allen Hutchinson; Ferdinand M Gerlach
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.