Literature DB >> 17876022

Meta-analysis: effect of prophylactic hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors on mortality and outcomes of infection.

Lillian Sung1, Paul C Nathan, Shabbir M H Alibhai, George A Tomlinson, Joseph Beyene.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Benefits of prophylactic hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) in adults and children receiving cancer chemotherapy or undergoing stem-cell transplantation (SCT) are unclear.
PURPOSE: To determine whether prophylactic CSFs decrease mortality, infections, and febrile neutropenia more than does placebo or no therapy in patients with cancer and in patients undergoing SCT. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until April 2007 and of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until the second quarter of 2006. STUDY SELECTION: We selected 148 trials that were reported in any language that randomly assigned patients to CSFs or to either placebo or no therapy. Prophylactic CSFs were given concurrently with or after initiation of chemotherapy. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data onto standardized forms. DATA SYNTHESIS: Short-term all-cause mortality appeared to be similar between the prophylactic CSF and the control groups (7.6% vs. 8.0%; relative risk, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.08]; absolute risk reduction, 0.4% [CI, -0.5% to 1.4%]). Risks for infection-related death with CSFs and placebo or no therapy were 3.1% and 3.8%, respectively (relative risk, 0.82 [CI, 0.66 to 1.02]; absolute risk reduction, 0.8% [CI, 0.0% to 1.5%]). Use of CSFs reduced the following more than did placebo or no therapy: documented infections (median rate, 38.9% vs. 43.1%; rate ratio, 0.85 [CI, 0.79 to 0.92]), microbiologically documented infections (median rate, 23.5% vs. 28.6%; rate ratio, 0.86 [CI, 0.77 to 0.96]), and episodes of febrile neutropenia (median rate, 25.3% vs. 44.2%; rate ratio, 0.71 [CI, 0.63 to 0.80]). LIMITATIONS: Trial designs, including assessments of infections, and participants were heterogeneous. Estimates of mortality effects were imprecise.
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic CSFs may have little or no effect on mortality but do decrease rates of infection in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy or those undergoing SCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17876022     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-6-200709180-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  48 in total

Review 1.  A way forward on the medically appropriate use of white cell growth factors.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Febrile neutropenia rates with adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in early breast cancer: discrepancy between published reports and community practice-a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  T Vandenberg; J Younus; S Al-Khayyat
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  SEOM clinical guidelines for myeloid growth factors.

Authors:  José Muñoz Langa; Pere Gascón; Javier de Castro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Febrile neutropenia in adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) with prophylactic pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon; Tracey L O'Connor; Pooja P Advani; Ellis G Levine; Ellen B Kossoff
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Assessment of an alternative meropenem dosing strategy compared with imipenem-cilastatin or traditional meropenem dosing after cefepime failure or intolerance in adults with neutropenic fever.

Authors:  Heather M Arnold; Peggy S McKinnon; Kristan M Augustin; Lindsay M Hladnik; Ed Casabar; Richard M Reichley; Erik R Dubberke; Peter Westervelt; David J Ritchie
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.705

6.  Guidelines for preventing infectious complications among hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients: a global perspective.

Authors:  Marcie Tomblyn; Tom Chiller; Hermann Einsele; Ronald Gress; Kent Sepkowitz; Jan Storek; John R Wingard; Jo-Anne H Young; Michael J Boeckh; Michael A Boeckh
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Jeffrey Crawford; Didier Kamioner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Febrile neutropenia rates with adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in early breast cancer: discrepancy between published reports and community practice-an updated analysis.

Authors:  J Younus; T Vandenberg; M Jawaid; M A Jawaid
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: cancer control and supportive care.

Authors:  Lillian Sung; Theo Zaoutis; Nicole J Ullrich; Donna Johnston; Lee Dupuis; Elena Ladas
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  Retinoid agonist Am80-enhanced neutrophil bactericidal activity arising from granulopoiesis in vitro and in a neutropenic mouse model.

Authors:  Wanjing Ding; Hiroyuki Shimada; Lin Li; Rahul Mittal; Xiaokun Zhang; Koichi Shudo; Qiaojun He; Nemani V Prasadarao; Lingtao Wu
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.