Literature DB >> 17875689

Genomic profiling reveals alternative genetic pathways of prostate tumorigenesis.

Jacques Lapointe1, Chunde Li, Craig P Giacomini, Keyan Salari, Stephanie Huang, Pei Wang, Michelle Ferrari, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, James D Brooks, Jonathan R Pollack.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is clinically heterogeneous, ranging from indolent to lethal disease. Expression profiling previously defined three subtypes of prostate cancer, one (subtype-1) linked to clinically favorable behavior, and the others (subtypes-2 and -3) linked with a more aggressive form of the disease. To explore disease heterogeneity at the genomic level, we carried out array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) on 64 prostate tumor specimens, including 55 primary tumors and 9 pelvic lymph node metastases. Unsupervised cluster analysis of DNA copy number alterations (CNA) identified recurrent aberrations, including a 6q15-deletion group associated with subtype-1 gene expression patterns and decreased tumor recurrence. Supervised analysis further disclosed distinct patterns of CNA among gene-expression subtypes, where subtype-1 tumors exhibited characteristic deletions at 5q21 and 6q15, and subtype-2 cases harbored deletions at 8p21 (NKX3-1) and 21q22 (resulting in TMPRSS2-ERG fusion). Lymph node metastases, predominantly subtype-3, displayed overall higher frequencies of CNA, and in particular gains at 8q24 (MYC) and 16p13, and loss at 10q23 (PTEN) and 16q23. Our findings reveal that prostate cancers develop via a limited number of alternative preferred genetic pathways. The resultant molecular genetic subtypes provide a new framework for investigating prostate cancer biology and explain in part the clinical heterogeneity of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17875689     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  115 in total

Review 1.  Genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher E Barbieri; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  A constitutively activated form of the p110beta isoform of PI3-kinase induces prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in mice.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Lee; George Poulogiannis; Saumyadipta Pyne; Shidong Jia; Lihua Zou; Sabina Signoretti; Massimo Loda; Lewis Clayton Cantley; Thomas M Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Suppression of tumor and metastasis progression through the scaffolding functions of SSeCKS/Gravin/AKAP12.

Authors:  Irwin H Gelman
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  An 8q24 gene desert variant associated with prostate cancer risk confers differential in vivo activity to a MYC enhancer.

Authors:  Nora F Wasserman; Ivy Aneas; Marcelo A Nobrega
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  The identification of chromosomal translocation, t(4;6)(q22;q15), in prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Shan; L Ambroisine; J Clark; R J Yáñez-Muñoz; G Fisher; S C Kudahetti; J Yang; S Kia; X Mao; A Fletcher; P Flohr; S Edwards; G Attard; J De-Bono; B D Young; C S Foster; V Reuter; H Moller; T D Oliver; D M Berney; P Scardino; J Cuzick; C S Cooper; Y-J Lu
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Somatic DNA copy number alterations and their potential clinical utility for predicting lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wennuan Liu; Li Wang; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Chinese and Western prostate cancers show alternate pathogenetic pathways in association with ERG status.

Authors:  Liyan Xue; Xueying Mao; Guoping Ren; Elzbieta Stankiewicz; Sakunthala C Kudahetti; Dongmei Lin; Luis Beltran; Daniel M Berney; Yong-Jie Lu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Regulators of gene expression as biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacey S Willard; Shahriar Koochekpour
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 9.  Recurrent gene fusions in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Scott A Tomlins; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Frequent genetic differences between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer provide an approach to identification of biomarkers for disease progression.

Authors:  Andrzej B Popławski; Michał Jankowski; Stephen W Erickson; Teresita Díaz de Ståhl; E Christopher Partridge; Chiquito Crasto; Jingyu Guo; John Gibson; Uwe Menzel; Carl Eg Bruder; Aneta Kaczmarczyk; Magdalena Benetkiewicz; Robin Andersson; Johanna Sandgren; Barbara Zegarska; Dariusz Bała; Ewa Srutek; David B Allison; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Wojciech Zegarski; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.