Literature DB >> 17875672

Lymphatic absorption of subcutaneously administered proteins: influence of different injection sites on the absorption of darbepoetin alfa using a sheep model.

Jagannath Kota1, Krishna K Machavaram, Danielle N McLennan, Glenn A Edwards, Christopher J H Porter, Susan A Charman.   

Abstract

The relative contribution of the lymph and blood in the absorption of darbepoetin alfa (DA) from different s.c. injection sites was determined using a central lymph-cannulated sheep model. DA was administered to parallel groups either as a bolus i.v. injection (0.5 mug/kg) into the jugular vein or as a bolus s.c. injection (2 mug/kg) into the interdigital space, the abdomen, or the shoulder. In the lymph-cannulated groups, the thoracic lymph duct was cannulated for continuous collection of central lymph, and blood samples were periodically collected via the jugular vein in all the groups. The concentration of DA in serum and lymph was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The total fraction of the dose reaching the systemic circulation and the fractions absorbed via the lymph and the blood were determined. A pharmacokinetic model was constructed to simultaneously fit the data from all the treatment groups. Absorption was essentially complete for all three injection sites in non-lymph-cannulated s.c. groups, but the rates of absorption differed significantly. Based on the modeling results for the lymph-cannulated groups, the lymphatics represented the predominant absorption route for both the interdigital (90 +/- 1%) and the abdomen (67 +/- 9%) injection sites. Fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran visualization studies revealed that the lymph draining the shoulder injection site entered the thoracic lymph duct distal to the point of cannulation, effectively precluding collection of thoracic lymph from this site. For that reason, the contribution of the lymphatics following injection in the shoulder could not be determined using these cannulation procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17875672     DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.015669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  19 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing the use and interpretation of animal models in the development of parenteral drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Marilyn N Martinez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Richter; Suraj G Bhansali; Marilyn E Morris
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  In vivo fluorescence imaging of IgG1 aggregates after subcutaneous and intravenous injection in mice.

Authors:  Vasco Filipe; Ivo Que; John F Carpenter; Clemens Löwik; Wim Jiskoot
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Interspecies pharmacokinetic modeling of subcutaneous absorption of rituximab in mice and rats.

Authors:  Leonid Kagan; Jie Zhao; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Subcutaneous absorption of monoclonal antibodies: role of dose, site of injection, and injection volume on rituximab pharmacokinetics in rats.

Authors:  Leonid Kagan; Michael R Turner; Sathy V Balu-Iyer; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  The mesenteric lymph duct cannulated rat model: application to the assessment of intestinal lymphatic drug transport.

Authors:  Natalie L Trevaskis; Luojuan Hu; Suzanne M Caliph; Sifei Han; Christopher J H Porter
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Proteolysis and Oxidation of Therapeutic Proteins After Intradermal or Subcutaneous Administration.

Authors:  Ninad Varkhede; Rupesh Bommana; Christian Schöneich; M Laird Forrest
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  From sewer to saviour - targeting the lymphatic system to promote drug exposure and activity.

Authors:  Natalie L Trevaskis; Lisa M Kaminskas; Christopher J H Porter
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  A pharmacokinetic model of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim application in normal mice and those with cyclophosphamide-induced granulocytopaenia.

Authors:  M Scholz; M Ackermann; C Engel; F Emmrich; M Loeffler; M Kamprad
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 10.  Challenges and Opportunities for the Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins.

Authors:  Michael R Turner; Sathy V Balu-Iyer
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.