Literature DB >> 17874602

Predicting the size of individual and group differences on speeded cognitive tasks.

Jing Chen1, Sandra Hale, Joel Myerson.   

Abstract

An a priori test of the difference engine model (Myerson, Hale, Zheng, Jenkins, & Widaman, 2003) was conducted using a large, diverse sample of individuals who performed three speeded verbal tasks and three speeded visuospatial tasks. Results demonstrated that, as predicted by the model, the group standard deviation (SD) on any task was proportional to the amount of processing required by that task. Both individual performances as well as those of fast and slow subgroups could be accurately predicted by the model using no free parameters, just an individual or subgroup's mean z-score and the values of theoretical constructs estimated from fits to the group SDs. Taken together, these results are consistent with post hoc analyses reported by Myerson et al. and provide even stronger supporting evidence. In particular, the ability to make quantitative predictions without using any free parameters provides the clearest demonstration to date of the power of an analytic approach on the basis of the difference engine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874602     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency.

Authors:  M E Faust; D A Balota; D H Spieler; F R Ferraro
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; D Spieler; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

3.  Individual and developmental differences in working memory across the life span.

Authors:  L Jenkins; J Myerson; S Hale; A F Fry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

4.  The difference engine: a model of diversity in speeded cognition.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale; Yingye Zheng; Lisa Jenkins; Keith F Widaman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

5.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Analysis of group differences in processing speed: where are the models of processing?

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Daniel Spieler; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

7.  Laws of visual choice reaction time.

Authors:  W H Teichner; M J Krebs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 8.934

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Making strides in modeling individual differences: reply to Leite, Ratcliff, and White (2007).

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale; Jing Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  Individual differences on speeded cognitive tasks: comment on Chen, Hale, and Myerson (2007).

Authors:  Fábio P Leite; Roger Ratcliff; Corey N White
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

3.  Individual differences, intelligence, and behavior analysis.

Authors:  Ben Williams; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reading and lexical-decision tasks generate different patterns of individual variability as a function of condition difficulty.

Authors:  Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Maria De Luca; Gloria Di Filippo; Chiara Valeria Marinelli; Donatella Spinelli
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

5.  A simultaneous examination of two forms of working memory training: Evidence for near transfer only.

Authors:  Meredith Minear; Faith Brasher; Claudia Brandt Guerrero; Mandy Brasher; Andrew Moore; Joshua Sukeena
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-10

6.  Individuals with low working memory spans show greater interference from irrelevant information because of poor source monitoring, not greater activation.

Authors:  Lindsey Lilienthal; Nathan S Rose; Elaine Tamez; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

7.  Age-related differences in inhibitory control predict audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Avanti Dey; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-29

8.  Slowing in reading and picture naming: the effects of aging and developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Maria De Luca; Chiara Valeria Marinelli; Donatella Spinelli; Pierluigi Zoccolotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory.

Authors:  Jesse Q Sargent; Jeffrey M Zacks; David Z Hambrick; Rose T Zacks; Christopher A Kurby; Heather R Bailey; Michelle L Eisenberg; Taylor M Beck
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-08-14

10.  Event memory uniquely predicts memory for large-scale space.

Authors:  Jesse Q Sargent; Jeffrey M Zacks; David Z Hambrick; Nan Lin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.