Literature DB >> 17874033

Flattening of sagittal spinal curvature as a predictor of vertebral fracture.

T Kobayashi1, N Takeda, Y Atsuta, T Matsuno.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In a 12-year prospective study of 100 adult volunteers, incident vertebral fractures were analyzed for potential predictors. Decreased sagittal spinal curvature and pre-existing fractures were identified as independent predictors. The risk of vertebral fracture increased to 8.6-fold with a 1 SD decrease in both thoracic and lumbar curves.
INTRODUCTION: Physiological spinal curvature acts as a shock absorber: however, it has not been demonstrated whether reduced spinal curvature is a risk of vertebral fracture. The aim of this prospective study is to assess the relationship between the extent of sagittal spinal curvature and incidence of vertebral fractures.
METHODS: One hundred community-based volunteers aged 50+ years were followed radiologically for at least 10 years. Entire spine radiograms of volunteers in erect position were used for evaluating sagittal spinal curvatures, grade of osteoporosis, and incident vertebral fractures.
RESULTS: Mean baseline age was 61.9 years and mean follow-up period was 12.0 years. In multivariate analysis, preexisting vertebral fracture (relative risk [RR] 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-11.20), and a decrease in either thoracic or lumbar curvature by 1-SD (RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.04-9.00) were independent predictors. The fracture risk even increased in the presence of a 1-SD decrease in both thoracic and lumbar curvature (RR 8.64, 95% CI 1.39-53.78).
CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of physiological curvatures in both thoracic and lumbar spine led to the increased risk of vertebral fracture by more than eightfold. The importance of evaluating sagittal spinal alignment should be emphasized, because it might indicate the risk of the first vertebral fracture, which is another strong predictor of subsequent fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874033     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0432-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  16 in total

1.  Which vertebrae should be assessed in diagnosing osteoporosis by plain radiography? Comparative study of radiographic findings and bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  X Yuan; N Takahashi; T Terashita; M Nakatani; K Mizuno
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  Asymptomatic vertebral deformity as a major risk factor for subsequent fractures and mortality: a long-term prospective study.

Authors:  Chatlert Pongchaiyakul; Nguyen D Nguyen; Graeme Jones; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman; Tuan V Nguyen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  The prevalence of vertebral fractures in mild ankylosing spondylitis and their relationship to bone mineral density.

Authors:  D Mitra; D M Elvins; D J Speden; A J Collins
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Kyphosis does not equal vertebral fractures: the Rancho Bernardo study.

Authors:  Diane L Schneider; Denise von Mühlen; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; David J Sartoris
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  The relationship of intrinsic fall risk factors to a recent history of falling in older women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Cathy M Arnold; Angela J Busch; Candice L Schachter; Liz Harrison; Wojciech Olszynski
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Height and lower extremity length as predictors of hip fracture: results of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Alexander R Opotowsky; Brian W Su; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Hyperkyphotic posture and risk of future osteoporotic fractures: the Rancho Bernardo study.

Authors:  Mei-Hua Huang; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Gail A Greendale; Deborah M Kado
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers.

Authors:  D E Gelb; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; K Blanke; K W McEnery
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Lumbar degenerative kyphosis. Clinical, radiological and epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Y Takemitsu; Y Harada; T Iwahara; M Miyamoto; Y Miyatake
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Sagittal balance of the spine in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  J Fechtenbaum; A Etcheto; S Kolta; A Feydy; C Roux; K Briot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Mechanical loading, damping, and load-driven bone formation in mouse tibiae.

Authors:  Todd Dodge; Mina Wanis; Ramez Ayoub; Liming Zhao; Nelson B Watts; Amit Bhattacharya; Ozan Akkus; Alexander Robling; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Longitudinal changes in lumbar bone mineral density distribution may increase the risk of wedge fractures.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Sundeep Khosla; Ahmad Nassr; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  Improved Pain and Quality of Life with Corrected Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis Subluxations Using CBP®: A Case Study and 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Curtis Fedorchuk; Blake Himel; Douglas F Lightstone
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 5.  [Treatment options for problematic thoracic and lumbar osteoporotic fractures].

Authors:  C E Heyde; Z Fekete; Y Robinson; S K Tschöke; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Anterior and posterior variations in mechanical properties of human vertebrae measured by nanoindentation.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Hua-Jun Wang; Chunfeng Zhao; Qingshan Chen; Ahmad Nassr; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Correction of Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis Following a Non-Surgical Structural Spinal Rehabilitation Protocol Using Lumbar Traction: A Case Study and Selective Review of Literature.

Authors:  Curtis Fedorchuk; Douglas F Lightstone; Christi McRae; Derek Kaczor
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2017-05-31

8.  The comparison of spinal curves and hip and ankle range of motions between old and young persons.

Authors:  Afsun Nodehi-Moghadam; Morteza Taghipour; Razie Goghatin Alibazi; Hamzeh Baharlouei
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2014-07-21

9.  The association between whole body sagittal balance and risk of falls among elderly patients seeking treatment for back pain.

Authors:  J Kim; J Y Hwang; J K Oh; M S Park; S W Kim; H Chang; T-H Kim
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Classification of arm swing as a clinical marker of advancing spinal deformity among community-dwelling female volunteers 60 years or older.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kobayashi; Shizuo Jimbo; Issei Senoo; Mutsuya Shimizu; Hiroshi Ito; P T Hisashi Chiba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.