Literature DB >> 17873996

Detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pediatric patients: is the cefoxitin disk diffusion test accurate enough?

M J Mimica1, E N Berezin, R L B Carvalho, I M Mimica, L M J Mimica, M A P Sáfadi, E Schneider, H H Caiaffa-Filho.   

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of several methods for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus using 101 clinical S. aureus isolates from pediatric patients in a tertiary hospital in Brazil; 50 isolates were mecA-positive and 51 were mecA-negative. The Etest and oxacillin agar screening plates were 100% sensitive and specific for mecA presence. Oxacillin and cefoxitin disks gave sensitivities of 96 and 92%, respectively, and 98% specificity. Alterations of CLSI cefoxitin breakpoints increased sensitivity to 98%, without decreasing specificity. Our results highlight the importance of a continuing evaluation of the recommended microbiological methods by different laboratories and in different settings. If necessary, laboratories should use a second test before reporting a strain as susceptible, especially when testing strains isolated from invasive or serious infections. With the new (2007) CLSI breakpoints, the cefoxitin-disk test appears to be a good option for the detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873996     DOI: 10.1590/s1413-86702007000400009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1413-8670            Impact factor:   1.949


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of real-time PCR with disk diffusion, agar screen and E-test methods for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Laleh Shariati; Majid Validi; Mohammad Amin Tabatabaiefar; Ali Karimi; Mohammad Reza Nafisi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Comparison of cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion methods for detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in a large-scale study.

Authors:  Nicole M Broekema; Tam T Van; Timothy A Monson; Steven A Marshall; David M Warshauer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Laboratory diagnosis of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: Genotypic or phenotypic methods?

Authors:  Rozane L Carvalho; Marcelo J Mimica
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2014-01

4.  Accurate Laboratory Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: Challenges and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Marcelo J Mimica
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2014-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.