Literature DB >> 17873263

Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in general practice: mismatch between cardiovascular risk and patients' risk perceptions.

T van der Weijden1, B van Steenkiste, H E J H Stoffers, D R M Timmermans, R Grol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) emphasize identifying high-risk patients for more intensive management, but patients' misconceptions of risk hamper implementation. Insight is needed into the type of patients that general practitioners (GPs) encounter in their cardiovascular prevention activities. How appropriate are the risk perceptions and worries of patients with whom GPs discuss CVD risks? What determines inappropriate risk perception?
METHOD: Cross-sectional study in 34 general practices. The study included patients aged 40 to 70 years with whom CVD risk was discussed during consultation. After the consultation, the GPs completed a registration form, and patients completed a questionnaire. Correlations between patients' actual CVD risk and risk perceptions were analyzed.
RESULTS: In total, 490 patients were included. In 17% of the consultations, patients were actually at high risk. Risk was perceived inappropriately by nearly 4 in 5 high-risk patients (incorrect optimism) and by 1 in 5 low-risk patients (incorrect pessimism). Smoking, hypertension, and obesity were determinants of perceiving CVD risk as high, whereas surprisingly, diabetic patients did not report any anxiety about their CVD risk. Men were more likely to perceive their CVD risk inappropriately than women.
CONCLUSION: In communicating CVD risk, GPs must be aware that they mostly encounter low-risk patients and that the perceived risk and worry do not necessarily correspond with the actual risk. Incorrect perceptions of CVD risk among men and patients with diabetes were striking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873263     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07305323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  26 in total

1.  Cardiovascular and diabetes risk perception in a Hispanic community sample.

Authors:  Vanessa A Diaz; Arch G Mainous; Deborah Williamson; Sharleen P Johnson; Michele E Knoll
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  In this issue: community care, healing, and excellence in research.

Authors:  Louise Acheson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  A French update on the Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) to assess continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use.

Authors:  Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi; Olivier Coste; Stéphanie Bioulac; Kelly Guichard; Pierre-Jean Monteyrol; Imad Ghorayeb; Terri E Weaver; Sébastien Weibel; Pierre Philip
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  School-based body mass index screening and parent notification: a statewide natural experiment.

Authors:  Kristine A Madsen
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-07-04

5.  Association between clinical factors and self-underestimation of cardiovascular risk in subjects submitted to a routine health evaluation.

Authors:  Thais N Helou; Raul D Santos; Antonio G Laurinavicius; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Antonio E P Pesaro; Fabio G M Franco; Raquel D O Conceição; José A M Carvalho; Fernando M F Silva; Mauricio Wajngarten; Marcelo Katz
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Overweight and obese patients do not seem to adequately recognize their own risk for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fernanda Leite-Pereira; Rui Medeiros; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Perception of recurrent stroke risk among black, white and Hispanic ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack survivors: the SWIFT study.

Authors:  Bernadette Boden-Albala; Heather Carman; Megan Moran; Margaret Doyle; Myunghee C Paik
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 8.  What to say and how to say it: effective communication for cardiovascular disease prevention.

Authors:  Ann Marie Navar; Neil J Stone; Seth S Martin
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Self-reported cognitive and emotional effects and lifestyle changes shortly after preventive cardiovascular consultations in general practice.

Authors:  Dea Kehler; Morten Bondo Christensen; Mette Bech Risør; Torsten Lauritzen; Bo Christensen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

10.  Effectiveness of an Intervention Aimed at Improving Information for Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk: INFORISK Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Carlos Brotons; Irene Moral; Diana Fernández; Mireia Puig; M Teresa Vilella; Teresa Puig; LLuís Cuixart; Gemma Férriz; Anna M Pedro; Roger Codinachs; Mónica Rodríguez; Rubén Fuentes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.