Literature DB >> 17873254

Patient decision aids to support clinical decision making: evaluating the decision or the outcomes of the decision.

Kirsten McCaffery1, Les Irwig, Patrick Bossuyt.   

Abstract

Decision aids (DAs) are tools to support patients make informed health decisions with their practitioner. They aim to improve patient knowledge of options, incorporate patient preferences and values, and increase patient involvement in health decision making. Increasingly, the debate about DAs concerns how they should be implemented in practice, with the view that DAs are superior to usual clinical care in facilitating health decisions. The authors challenge this view and suggest that DA research has focused on measures of decision process, leaving the effects on the outcome of the decision relatively unknown. It is still unclear in which conditions DAs are better for patient health and well-being than clinician-led decisions. The authors present a new randomized design to examine the effects of DA-supported patient choice on patient-centered outcomes to identify where DAs are best implemented in clinical practice. In this design, patients are randomized to 1 of 4 arms: intervention A, intervention B, choice of either intervention supported by a clinician, or choice of either intervention supported by a decision aid. Health and quality of life measured over the long term are presented as the primary outcomes. The authors propose that this design will allow the proper assessment of different modes of decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873254     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07306787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  9 in total

1.  The independent effect of cancer on outcomes: a potential limitation of surgical risk prediction.

Authors:  Ira L Leeds; Joseph K Canner; Jonathan E Efron; Nita Ahuja; Elliott R Haut; Elizabeth C Wick; Fabian M Johnston
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Psychosocial outcomes of three triage methods for the management of borderline abnormal cervical smears: an open randomised trial.

Authors:  Kirsten J McCaffery; Les Irwig; Robin Turner; Siew Foong Chan; Petra Macaskill; Mary Lewicka; Judith Clarke; Edith Weisberg; Alex Barratt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-23

3.  A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Lyndal Trevena; Judy M Simpson; Alexandra Barratt; Don Nutbeam; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-26

4.  Patient involvement in surgical treatment decisions and satisfaction with the treatment results after lumbar intervertebral discectomy.

Authors:  Tõnu Rätsep; Andreas Abel; Ülla Linnamägi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The Attitude of Physicians toward the Use of Patient Decision Aids in Iran as a Developing Country.

Authors:  Hamideh Rashidian; Saharnaz Nedjat; Leila Mounesan; Leila Haghjou; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2015-02-20

6.  Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Nancy Baxter; Jennifer Jones; Kelly Metcalfe; Natalie Causarano; Stefan O P Hofer; Anne O'Neill; Terry Cheng; Elizabeth Starenkyj; Toni Zhong
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure.

Authors:  Alexandra Gheondea-Eladi
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  The perspectives of Iranian physicians and patients towards patient decision aids: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hamideh Rashidian; Saharnaz Nedjat; Reza Majdzadeh; Jaleh Gholami; Leila Haghjou; Bahar Sadeghi Abdollahi; Fereydoun Davatchi; Arash Rashidian
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-09-25

Review 9.  "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Isabelle Scholl; Caroline Tietbohl; Mala Mann; Adrian G K Edwards; Catharine Clay; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Carmen L Lewis; Richard M Wexler; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.