Literature DB >> 17873147

Reduced mandibular cast splints an alternative in Herbst therapy? A prospective multicentre study.

Julia von Bremen1, Hans Pancherz, Sabine Ruf.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse anchorage loss with reduced, in comparison with total mandibular cast splints during Herbst treatment. Lateral head films of 32 Class II division 1 patients (15 females, 17 males) aged 13.0 years with reduced mandibular cast splints (RMS: second premolar to second premolar) and of 34 Class II division 1 patients (19 females, 15 males) aged 13.9 years with total mandibular cast splints (TMS: molar to molar) were analysed before (T1) and directly after (T2) Herbst treatment. Anchorage loss was assessed considering mandibular incisor proclination, changes of lower incisor edge position, and changes of occlusal plane inclination. To assess possible group differences, Student's t-tests were applied. The lower incisors proclined more in the RMS (11.8 degrees) than in the TMS (9.3 degrees) group. However, the amount of incisal edge advancement was less in the RMS (2.9 mm) than in the TMS (3.7 mm) group. The occlusal plane tilted insignificantly less in the RMS (5.7 degrees) than in the TMS (6.3 degrees) group. Reduced and total mandibular casted splint anchorage seemed to be similarly effective. Anchorage loss, measured by mandibular incisor proclination, was greater in the reduced anchorage group, whereas measured by lower incisor edge advancement, it was larger in the total anchorage group. Therefore, RMS can be recommended for Herbst treatment since they are less expensive than total splints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873147     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  Changes in alveolar bone support induced by the Herbst appliance: a tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  João Paulo Schwartz; Taisa Boamorte Raveli; Humberto Osvaldo Schwartz-Filho; Dirceu Barnabé Raveli
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

2.  Herbst treatment with mandibular cast splints--revisited.

Authors:  Tarek El-Fateh; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison between Herbst appliances with or without miniscrew anchorage.

Authors:  Antonio Manni; Marco Pasini; Cozzani Mauro
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-12

4.  Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control.

Authors:  Antonio Manni; Marco Pasini; Laura Mazzotta; Sabrina Mutinelli; Claudio Nuzzo; Felice Roberto Grassi; Mauro Cozzani
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-05-19

5.  Cone beam computed tomography study of apical root resorption induced by Herbst appliance.

Authors:  João Paulo Schwartz; Taísa Boamorte Raveli; Kélei Cristina de Mathias Almeida; Humberto Osvaldo Schwartz-Filho; Dirceu Barnabé Raveli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Herbst-multibracket appliance treatment: is there an association between lower incisor position changes and the development of labial gingival recessions?

Authors:  S Südwasser; N C Bock; J Jost; S Killat; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 1.938

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.