INTRODUCTION:HDT/ASCT is standard for relapsed and refractory DLCL patients responding to second-line chemotherapy. We incorporated a thrombopoietic agent into the ICE chemotherapy program to potentially: decrease platelet associated toxicities, augment stem cell collection and maintain dose intensity. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I/II trial examines PEG-rHuMGDF versus placebo with ICE chemotherapy. Phase I compared three cohorts and defined a clinically effective dose (CED). Phase II evaluated the CED versus placebo. Outcome measures included safety, hematological end-points, stem cell collection and the impact of dose-intensity on outcome. RESULTS:Forty-one patients with primary refractory (16) or relapsed DLCL (25) were treated; Response rates for evaluable patients are: 75% (12/16) for placebo and 82% (18/22) for PEG-rHuMGDF. PEG-rHuMGDF treated patients had significantly less grade IV thrombocytopenia, higher median platelet nadirs, and less platelet transfusion per cycle. ICE dose intensity was improved with PEG-rHuMGDF versus placebo: 75 versus 42% (P = 0.008). At 8.5 years median follow-up, overall and event-free survival are 47 and 31%, respectively. Patients treated on PEG-rHuMGDF versus placebo had improved survival (59 versus 31%, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION:PEG-rHuMGDF ameliorated thrombocytopenia, improved platelet recovery, and maintained ICE dose intensity. Potential survival advantages conferred by maintaining dose intensity require validation with newer thrombopoietic agents.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: HDT/ASCT is standard for relapsed and refractory DLCL patients responding to second-line chemotherapy. We incorporated a thrombopoietic agent into the ICE chemotherapy program to potentially: decrease platelet associated toxicities, augment stem cell collection and maintain dose intensity. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I/II trial examines PEG-rHuMGDF versus placebo with ICE chemotherapy. Phase I compared three cohorts and defined a clinically effective dose (CED). Phase II evaluated the CED versus placebo. Outcome measures included safety, hematological end-points, stem cell collection and the impact of dose-intensity on outcome. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with primary refractory (16) or relapsed DLCL (25) were treated; Response rates for evaluable patients are: 75% (12/16) for placebo and 82% (18/22) for PEG-rHuMGDF. PEG-rHuMGDF treated patients had significantly less grade IV thrombocytopenia, higher median platelet nadirs, and less platelet transfusion per cycle. ICE dose intensity was improved with PEG-rHuMGDF versus placebo: 75 versus 42% (P = 0.008). At 8.5 years median follow-up, overall and event-free survival are 47 and 31%, respectively. Patients treated on PEG-rHuMGDF versus placebo had improved survival (59 versus 31%, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: PEG-rHuMGDF ameliorated thrombocytopenia, improved platelet recovery, and maintained ICE dose intensity. Potential survival advantages conferred by maintaining dose intensity require validation with newer thrombopoietic agents.
Authors: Gerald A Soff; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Luis J Marfil Rivera; Jon Fryzek; Megan Mullins; Lauren C Bylsma; Joseph K Park Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Michael Desborough; Andreas V Hadjinicolaou; Anna Chaimani; Marialena Trivella; Paresh Vyas; Carolyn Doree; Sally Hopewell; Simon J Stanworth; Lise J Estcourt Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-10-31
Authors: Michael Desborough; Lise J Estcourt; Carolyn Doree; Marialena Trivella; Sally Hopewell; Simon J Stanworth; Michael F Murphy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-08-22
Authors: Hanny Al-Samkari; Aric D Parnes; Katayoon Goodarzi; James I Weitzman; Jean M Connors; David J Kuter Journal: Haematologica Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Eric S Winer; Howard Safran; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Donald A Richards; Lee Hartner; Frederic Forget; Rodryg Ramlau; Kirushna Kumar; Bhabita Mayer; Brendan M Johnson; Conrad A Messam; Yasser Mostafa Kamel Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 4.452