OBJECTIVE: To identify patients admitted to hospital with coronary events and to estimate their pre-admission coronary risk, including their lipid levels. Despite the available data and numerous guidelines, evidence indicates that many patients with hyperlipidemia are undertreated and are not achieving target lipid levels. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Acute care community hospital in Winnipeg, Man. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 153 patients who were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or acute coronary syndrome upon admission. METHOD: Each patient's 10-year risk of developing coronary artery disease was calculated, and his or her risk status was established. Each patient's low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were recorded and categorized based on current Canadian guidelines. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 67.6 years; 60.8% were male. Patients in the low-risk category had a mean LDL-C level of 2.98 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.66 to 3.29), and patients in the moderate-risk category had a mean LDL-C level of 3.01 mmol/L (95% CI 2.74 to 3.28), both significantly lower (P < .05) than the LDL-C target levels for patients in those risk categories according to Canadian guidelines. The mean LDL-C level for patients in the very high-risk category, however, was 2.53 mmol/L (95% CI 2.35 to 2.71), above the recommended goal. Almost half the patients (48.3%) in the very high-risk category had LDL-C levels that exceeded the goal. Slightly more than 1 in 3 patients in the very high-risk category was reported to be taking lipid-lowering agents. CONCLUSION: Patients in the community who are at very high risk of having cardiovascular events are undertreated with respect to attaining LDL-C target levels. These findings point to an opportunity to prevent patient morbidity and reduce the number of hospitalizations for cardiovascular events.
OBJECTIVE: To identify patients admitted to hospital with coronary events and to estimate their pre-admission coronary risk, including their lipid levels. Despite the available data and numerous guidelines, evidence indicates that many patients with hyperlipidemia are undertreated and are not achieving target lipid levels. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Acute care community hospital in Winnipeg, Man. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 153 patients who were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or acute coronary syndrome upon admission. METHOD: Each patient's 10-year risk of developing coronary artery disease was calculated, and his or her risk status was established. Each patient's low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were recorded and categorized based on current Canadian guidelines. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 67.6 years; 60.8% were male. Patients in the low-risk category had a mean LDL-C level of 2.98 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.66 to 3.29), and patients in the moderate-risk category had a mean LDL-C level of 3.01 mmol/L (95% CI 2.74 to 3.28), both significantly lower (P < .05) than the LDL-C target levels for patients in those risk categories according to Canadian guidelines. The mean LDL-C level for patients in the very high-risk category, however, was 2.53 mmol/L (95% CI 2.35 to 2.71), above the recommended goal. Almost half the patients (48.3%) in the very high-risk category had LDL-C levels that exceeded the goal. Slightly more than 1 in 3 patients in the very high-risk category was reported to be taking lipid-lowering agents. CONCLUSION:Patients in the community who are at very high risk of having cardiovascular events are undertreated with respect to attaining LDL-C target levels. These findings point to an opportunity to prevent patient morbidity and reduce the number of hospitalizations for cardiovascular events.
Authors: K K Teo; J R Burton; C E Buller; S Plante; D Catellier; W Tymchak; V Dzavik; D Taylor; S Yokoyama; T J Montague Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Peter S Sever; Björn Dahlöf; Neil R Poulter; Hans Wedel; Gareth Beevers; Mark Caulfield; Rory Collins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Arni Kristinsson; Gordon T McInnes; Jesper Mehlsen; Markku Nieminen; Eoin O'Brien; Jan Ostergren Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-04-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: B Pitt; D Waters; W V Brown; A J van Boven; L Schwartz; L M Title; D Eisenberg; L Shurzinske; L S McCormick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-07-08 Impact factor: 91.245