OBJECTIVE: To learn what educators across the health professions involved in primary health care think about the use and development of academic family health teams to provide, teach, and model interprofessional collaboration and about the introduction of interprofessional education (IPE) within structured academic primary care. DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Higher education institutions across Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Purposeful sample of 36 participants from nursing, pharmacy, speech language pathology, occupational and physical therapy, social work, and family medicine. METHOD: Participants were invited to join focus groups of 6 to 8 health professionals. Themes were derived from qualitative analysis of data gathered using a grounded-theory approach. MAIN FINDINGS: Three major themes were identified: the lack of consensus on opportunities for future academic family health teams to teach IPE, the lack of formalized teaching of interprofessional collaboration and the fact that what little has been developed is primarily for family physicians and hardly at all for other health professionals, and the confusion around the definition of IPE across health professions. CONCLUSION: The future role of family health teams in academic primary care settings as a place for learners to see teamwork in action and to learn collaboration needs to be examined. Unless academic settings are developed to provide the necessary training for primary health care professionals to work in teams, a new generation of health care professionals will continue to work in status quo environments, and reform initiatives are unlikely to become sustainable over time.
OBJECTIVE: To learn what educators across the health professions involved in primary health care think about the use and development of academic family health teams to provide, teach, and model interprofessional collaboration and about the introduction of interprofessional education (IPE) within structured academic primary care. DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Higher education institutions across Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Purposeful sample of 36 participants from nursing, pharmacy, speech language pathology, occupational and physical therapy, social work, and family medicine. METHOD:Participants were invited to join focus groups of 6 to 8 health professionals. Themes were derived from qualitative analysis of data gathered using a grounded-theory approach. MAIN FINDINGS: Three major themes were identified: the lack of consensus on opportunities for future academic family health teams to teach IPE, the lack of formalized teaching of interprofessional collaboration and the fact that what little has been developed is primarily for family physicians and hardly at all for other health professionals, and the confusion around the definition of IPE across health professions. CONCLUSION: The future role of family health teams in academic primary care settings as a place for learners to see teamwork in action and to learn collaboration needs to be examined. Unless academic settings are developed to provide the necessary training for primary health care professionals to work in teams, a new generation of health care professionals will continue to work in status quo environments, and reform initiatives are unlikely to become sustainable over time.
Authors: Luis González-de Paz; Belchin Kostov; Jose A López-Pina; Adelaida Zabalegui-Yárnoz; M Dolores Navarro-Rubio; Antoni Sisó-Almirall Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-05-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: David A Keegan; Ian Scott; Michael Sylvester; Amy Tan; Kathleen Horrey; W Wayne Weston Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.275