Literature DB >> 17872785

Epidemiology of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection: implications for screening.

Gerald Konrad1, Alan Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference in outcomes between universal screening and risk-based assessment for prenatal group B streptococcus (GBS) infection based on the epidemiology of early-onset GBS infection in Winnipeg, Man, and to examine its implications for prenatal GBS screening.
DESIGN: Retrospective random chart audit of 330 women receiving intrapartum hospital care and retrospective chart audit of all infants with early-onset neonatal GBS disease over 2 years.
SETTING: Each of the 3 hospitals in Winnipeg, Man, offering intrapartum services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal charts were audited for history of prenatal GBS screening, GBS status, clinical risk factors for neonatal GBS transmission, and use of intrapartum antibiotics to prevent neonatal GBS infection. Neonatal GBS records were audited for maternal clinical risk factors for GBS transmission, history of maternal GBS screening and GBS status, use of maternal intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, and neonatal outcome.
RESULTS: Screening revealed a 26% GBS carrier rate in our population. Among these carriers, 70% (or 18% of the population) had no other clinical risk factors for neonatal GBS transmission. The transmission rate for untreated GBS-positive women was 1.74 per 1000 women. The differences in outcomes between universal and risk-based screening were small in our population. A total of 3449 women would require universal screening to prevent a single case of early-onset neonatal GBS disease that would occur if a risk-based approach were used (3 cases per year). This number increases to 68,966 to prevent a single GBS-related death (1 case in 7 years). An additional 679 women would receive intrapartum prophylactic antibiotics per year with universal screening than would have received antibiotics with a risk-based approach.
CONCLUSION: The differences in neonatal GBS transmission rates resulting from universal versus risk-based screening in Winnipeg require universal screening of many women for results to become apparent. Universal screening and antibiotic prophylaxis of all GBS carriers result in increased antibiotic exposure in our population, which might carry its own risks. Therefore, patients should be involved in decisions on whether to be screened based on identification of risks and benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17872785      PMCID: PMC1949222     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  10 in total

1.  ACOG Committee Opinion: number 279, December 2002. Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Association of intrapartum antibiotic exposure and late-onset serious bacterial infections in infants.

Authors:  Tiffany S Glasgow; Paul C Young; Jordan Wallin; Carolyn Kwok; Greg Stoddard; Sean Firth; Matthew Samore; Carrie L Byington
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Antibiotic use in pregnancy and drug-resistant infant sepsis.

Authors:  B M Mercer; T L Carr; D D Beazley; D T Crouse; B M Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A population-based comparison of strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates.

Authors:  Stephanie J Schrag; Elizabeth R Zell; Ruth Lynfield; Aaron Roome; Kathryn E Arnold; Allen S Craig; Lee H Harrison; Arthur Reingold; Karen Stefonek; Glenda Smith; Melanie Gamble; Anne Schuchat
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  The prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcus infection: technical report from the New Zealand GBS Consensus Working Party.

Authors:  Norma Campbell; Alison Eddy; Brian Darlow; Peter Stone; Keith Grimwood
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2004-08-20

6.  Anaphylaxis in labor secondary to prophylaxis against group B Streptococcus. A case report.

Authors:  A B Dunn; J Blomquist; V Khouzami
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Trends in incidence and antimicrobial resistance of early-onset sepsis: population-based surveillance in San Francisco and Atlanta.

Authors:  Terri B Hyde; Tami M Hilger; Arthur Reingold; Monica M Farley; Katherine L O'Brien; Anne Schuchat
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Group B streptococcal testing during pregnancy: survey of postpartum women and audit of current prenatal screening practices.

Authors:  Laura Youden; Mark Downing; Beth Halperin; Heather Scott; Bruce Smith; Scott A Halperin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2005-11

9.  Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Revised guidelines from CDC.

Authors:  Stephanie Schrag; Rachel Gorwitz; Kristi Fultz-Butts; Anne Schuchat
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2002-08-16

Review 10.  RETIRED: The prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease.

Authors:  Deborah M Money; Simon Dobson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2004-09
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Preclinical Evaluation of Tolerability of a Selective, Bacteriostatic, Locally Active Vaginal Formulation.

Authors:  Luca Ivan Ardolino; Marisa Meloni; Giuseppe Brugali; Emanuela Corsini; Corrado Lodovico Galli
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2016-07-25

2.  Antimicrobial Resistance Profile and Associated Factors of Group B Streptococci Colonization among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in Jigjiga, Southeast Ethiopia.

Authors:  Addisu Tesfaye; Addisu Melese; Awoke Derbie
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.