STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stressors and coping strategies for stress in a sample of anesthesiologists working at a university hospital. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study via survey instrument. SETTING: University department of anesthesiology and critical care at a 1305-bed hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 135 anesthesia specialists and specialist trainees of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 135 self-reporting questionnaires used to assess sociodemographic data, workload, task demands, stress-coping strategies, physical health, emotional well-being, and working conditions, were distributed. Of these, 89 questionnaires were completed and returned, for a response rate of 65.9%: 33 (37.1%) female anesthesiologists and 56 (62.9%) male anesthesiologists. The burden of task-related stressors and of communication possibilities was assessed differently by male and female anesthesiologists. Female anesthesiologists more frequently reported higher concentration demands (P = 0.013) and limited possibilities to control work (P = 0.009) than did their male colleagues. Work at intensive care units (P = 0.001) was particularly demanding and burdensome for female anesthesiologists. Combined evaluation of various stress-coping strategies did not show significant differences between the genders. Generally, anesthesiologists had more confidence in their own personal capabilities and resources and in their social-particularly family-support outside the workplace, than in their social support from colleagues and superiors. CONCLUSIONS: Task-related stressors and communication possibilities differed between male and female anesthesiologists in our institution. Female anesthesiologists felt that they had less control over their work.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stressors and coping strategies for stress in a sample of anesthesiologists working at a university hospital. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study via survey instrument. SETTING: University department of anesthesiology and critical care at a 1305-bed hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 135 anesthesia specialists and specialist trainees of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 135 self-reporting questionnaires used to assess sociodemographic data, workload, task demands, stress-coping strategies, physical health, emotional well-being, and working conditions, were distributed. Of these, 89 questionnaires were completed and returned, for a response rate of 65.9%: 33 (37.1%) female anesthesiologists and 56 (62.9%) male anesthesiologists. The burden of task-related stressors and of communication possibilities was assessed differently by male and female anesthesiologists. Female anesthesiologists more frequently reported higher concentration demands (P = 0.013) and limited possibilities to control work (P = 0.009) than did their male colleagues. Work at intensive care units (P = 0.001) was particularly demanding and burdensome for female anesthesiologists. Combined evaluation of various stress-coping strategies did not show significant differences between the genders. Generally, anesthesiologists had more confidence in their own personal capabilities and resources and in their social-particularly family-support outside the workplace, than in their social support from colleagues and superiors. CONCLUSIONS: Task-related stressors and communication possibilities differed between male and female anesthesiologists in our institution. Female anesthesiologists felt that they had less control over their work.
Authors: Wolfgang Lederer; Peter Paal; Daniel von Langen; Alice Sanwald; Christian Traweger; Johann F Kinzl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katarzyna Dubas-Jakóbczyk; Alicja Domagała; Dorota Kiedik; Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 3.390