Literature DB >> 17869972

Sedation and weaning from mechanical ventilation: effects of process optimization outside a clinical trial.

Stephan M Jakob1, Szabina Lubszky, Raymond Friolet, Hans Ulrich Rothen, Anna Kolarova, Jukka Takala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the effects of reorganization and changes in the care process, including use of protocols for sedation and weaning from mechanical ventilation, on the use of sedative and analgesic drugs and on length of respiratory support and stay in the intensive care unit (ICU).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cohorts of 100 mechanically ventilated ICU patients, admitted in 1999 (baseline), 2000 (implementation I, after a change in ICU organization and in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches), and 2001 (implementation II, after introduction of protocols for weaning from mechanical ventilation and sedation), were studied retrospectively.
RESULTS: Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), diagnostic groups, and number of organ failures were similar in all groups. Data are reported as median (interquartile range). Time on mechanical ventilation decreased from 18 (7-41) (baseline) to 12 (7-27) hours (implementation II) (P = .046), an effect which was entirely attributable to noninvasive ventilation, and length of ICU stay decreased in survivors from 37 (21-71) to 25 (19-63) hours (P = .049). The amount of morphine (P = .001) and midazolam (P = .050) decreased, whereas the amount of propofol (P = .052) and fentanyl increased (P = .001). Total Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) per patient decreased from 137 (99-272) to 113 (87-256) points (P = .009). Intensive care unit mortality was 19% (baseline), 8% (implementation I), and 7% (implementation II) (P = .020).
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in organizational and care processes were associated with an altered pattern of sedative and analgesic drug prescription, a decrease in length of (noninvasive) respiratory support and length of stay in survivors, and decreases in resource use as measured by TISS-28 and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17869972     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  12 in total

1.  Diffusion of Evidence-based Intensive Care Unit Organizational Practices. A State-Wide Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Kohn; Vanessa Madden; Jeremy M Kahn; David A Asch; Amber E Barnato; Scott D Halpern; Meeta Prasad Kerlin
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  [Delirium on the ICU: clinical impact, diagnostic workup, and therapy].

Authors:  N Theuerkauf; U Guenther
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety.

Authors:  Daniel L Jackson; Clare W Proudfoot; Kimberley F Cann; Tim Walsh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Evidence and consensus-based German guidelines for the management of analgesia, sedation and delirium in intensive care--short version.

Authors:  Jörg Martin; Anja Heymann; Katrin Bäsell; Ralf Baron; Rolf Biniek; Hartmut Bürkle; Peter Dall; Christine Dictus; Verena Eggers; Ingolf Eichler; Lothar Engelmann; Lars Garten; Wolfgang Hartl; Ulrike Haase; Ralf Huth; Paul Kessler; Stefan Kleinschmidt; Wolfgang Koppert; Franz-Josef Kretz; Heinz Laubenthal; Guenter Marggraf; Andreas Meiser; Edmund Neugebauer; Ulrike Neuhaus; Christian Putensen; Michael Quintel; Alexander Reske; Bernard Roth; Jens Scholz; Stefan Schröder; Dierk Schreiter; Jürgen Schüttler; Gerhard Schwarzmann; Robert Stingele; Peter Tonner; Philip Tränkle; Rolf Detlef Treede; Tomislav Trupkovic; Michael Tryba; Frank Wappler; Christian Waydhas; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-02

5.  Effect of sedation level on the prevalence of delirium when assessed with CAM-ICU and ICDSC.

Authors:  Matthias Haenggi; Sina Blum; Ruth Brechbuehl; Anna Brunello; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  How to implement monitoring tools for sedation, pain and delirium in the intensive care unit: an experimental cohort study.

Authors:  Finn M Radtke; Anja Heymann; Martin Franck; Friederike Maechler; Tanja Drews; Alawi Luetz; Irit Nachtigall; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Claudia D Spies
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The Association of ICU Acuity With Outcomes of Patients at Low Risk of Dying.

Authors:  Kelly C Vranas; Jeffrey K Jopling; Jennifer Y Scott; Omar Badawi; Michael O Harhay; Christopher G Slatore; Meghan C Ramsey; Michael J Breslow; Arnold S Milstein; Meeta Prasad Kerlin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Comparison of sedation strategies for critically ill patients: a protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Lisa D Burry; Salmaan Kanji; Sangeeta Mehta; Melanie Guenette; Claudio M Martin; Dean A Fergusson; Neill K Adhikari; Ingrid Egerod; David Williamson; Sharon Straus; David Moher; E Wesley Ely; Louise Rose
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-20

9.  Combined didactic and scenario-based education improves the ability of intensive care unit staff to recognize delirium at the bedside.

Authors:  John W Devlin; Francois Marquis; Richard R Riker; Tracey Robbins; Erik Garpestad; Jeffrey J Fong; Dorothy Didomenico; Yoanna Skrobik
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Night-time intensivists--waste of resources or failure of process optimization?

Authors:  Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.