Literature DB >> 17869305

Ethnic differences in relative risk of idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis in North America.

Andrew Mente1, R John D'A Honey, John R McLaughlin, Shelley B Bull, Alexander G Logan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Data on susceptibility to kidney stone disease are sparse in individuals of nonEuropean ancestry residing in North America. We determined the relative risk of calcium nephrolithiasis among people of different ethnic backgrounds living in the same geographic region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design 1,128 consecutive patients with idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis 18 to 50 years old were recruited from a population based Kidney Stone Center in Toronto. Age and gender adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by logistic regression using the 2001 Canada Census population data.
RESULTS: Compared to Europeans the relative risk of calcium nephrolithiasis was significantly higher in individuals of Arabic (OR 3.8, 2.7-5.2), West Indian (OR 2.5, 1.8-3.4), West Asian (OR 2.4, 1.7-3.4) and Latin American (OR 1.7, 1.2-2.4) origin, and significantly lower in those of East Asian (OR 0.4, 0.3-0.5) and African (OR 0.7, 0.5-0.9) background. Several ethnic groups had kidney stone risk factors that were significantly different from those of the European group including higher urinary uric acid, urea excretion and estimated protein intake, and lower urinary citrate, potassium, magnesium and phosphate excretion. However, none was consistent with the variation in relative risk of stone disease overall.
CONCLUSIONS: The propensity for the development of calcium nephrolithiasis differed markedly among ethnic groups in North America. While environmental factors could not be completely ruled out, this variability may reflect the influence of genetic susceptibility because there was no dominant environmental factor to account for the differences in relative risk of stone disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17869305     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Race, ethnicity and urolithiasis: a critical review.

Authors:  Allen L Rodgers
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  [Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for urolithiasis].

Authors:  F Praus; M Schönthaler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  The genetic components of idiopathic nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Massimo Attanasio
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Use of Ultrasound in Pediatric Renal Stone Diagnosis and Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Morrison; Trudy Kawal; Jason P Van Batavia; Arun K Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Race- and Sex-related Differences in Nephrolithiasis Risk Among Blacks and Whites in the Southern Community Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Edmond K Kabagambe; Xiang Shu; Xijing Han; Nicole L Miller; Loren Lipworth
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Incidence of upper urinary tract stone during 15 years in Tajima area, Japan: a hospital-based study.

Authors:  Takeshi Takahashi; Akifumi Yamane; Kosuke Okasho; Takeshi Yoshikawa; Harutake Sawazaki; Syodo Wataru; Yoji Taki; Hideo Takeuchi
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-09-25

7.  Incidence of osteoporosis in patients with urolithiasis.

Authors:  Radojka Bijelic; Snjezana Milicevic; Jagoda Balaban
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2014-10-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.