Literature DB >> 17869202

Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.

Karen Z H Li1, Kate Dupuis.   

Abstract

The sequential flanker task was developed to study sequential performance using methodology borrowed from studies of task switching. We investigated age differences in backward inhibition [BI: Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26] during a sequential category search task. Participants learned four animal categories in a fixed order, and then searched for exemplars from those categories in runs of mis-ordered exemplars. Across three experiments, we observed robust BI facilitation effects. However, the magnitude of BI effects did not differ across age groups. This age-invariance held despite manipulations of distractibility (Experiment 2), and interstimulus interval (Experiment 3), suggesting that BI processes may be relatively automatic and obligatory in the context of sequential tasks. The findings are discussed in terms of the attentional mechanisms that underlie task set switching and sequential performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17869202     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  9 in total

1.  Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Miriam Gade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Is flanker-based inhibition related to age? Identifying specific influences of individual differences on neurocognitive variables.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Backward Inhibition and Deinhibition: A Review.

Authors:  Jiwen Chen; Shujie Wu; Fuhong Li
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  An attentional scope model of rumination.

Authors:  Anson J Whitmer; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching.

Authors:  Corinne Pettigrew; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Task Inhibition and Response Inhibition in Older vs. Younger Adults: A Diffusion Model Analysis.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-15

7.  Distinct brain responses to different inhibitions: Evidence from a modified Flanker Task.

Authors:  Liufang Xie; Maofan Ren; Bihua Cao; Fuhong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  How positive affect modulates proactive control: reduced usage of informative cues under positive affect with low arousal.

Authors:  Kerstin Fröber; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-27

9.  Sequential modulation of cue use in the task switching paradigm.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Renate Reisenauer; Thomas Jacobsen; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.