Literature DB >> 17869064

Afterdischarges during cortical stimulation at different frequencies and intensities.

Gholam K Motamedi1, Oladotun Okunola, Christopher G Kalhorn, Navid Mostofi, Yuko Mizuno-Matsumoto, Yong-Won Cho, Kimford J Meador.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The occurrence of unwanted afterdischarges (ADs) impedes cortical stimulation for mapping purposes. We investigated the safety of several stimulation paradigms.
METHODS: We compared the incidence of ADs and behavioral responses of two stimulation frequencies (50 and 100 Hz), at two intensities (1 and 0.2 ms pulse widths).
RESULTS: Stimulation with 100 Hz was more likely to cause ADs than 50 Hz, and stimulation using 1 ms pulse width was more likely to cause ADs than 0.2 ms.
CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation using 50 Hz frequency with a pulse width of 0.2 ms might be safer during cortical mapping.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17869064     DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2007.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Res        ISSN: 0920-1211            Impact factor:   3.045


  4 in total

Review 1.  Subdural electrodes.

Authors:  Ronald P Lesser; Nathan E Crone; W R S Webber
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Electrical Stimulation Mapping of Brain Function: A Comparison of Subdural Electrodes and Stereo-EEG.

Authors:  Krista M Grande; Sarah K Z Ihnen; Ravindra Arya
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Comparison of Thresholds between Bipolar and Monopolar Electrical Cortical Stimulation.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takahashi; Rei Enatsu; Aya Kanno; Seiichiro Imataka; Shoichi Komura; Tomoaki Tamada; Kyoya Sakashita; Ryohei Chiba; Takuro Saito; Nobuhiro Mikuni
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.036

4.  High-frequency and brief-pulse stimulation pulses terminate cortical electrical stimulation-induced afterdischarges.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Ren; Yong-Jie Li; Tao Yu; Duan-Yu Ni; Guo-Jun Zhang; Wei Du; Yuan-Yuan Piao; Xiao-Xia Zhou
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.135

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.