Literature DB >> 17869042

Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglotto-pexy or cricohyoido-pexy: experience on 32 patients.

Meijin Nakayama1, Makito Okamoto, Syunsuke Miyamoto, Masahiko Takeda, Satoru Yokobori, Takashi Masaki, Yutomo Seino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Supracricoid laryngectomy (SCL) with Cricohyoidoepiglotto-pexy (CHEP) or Cricohyoido-pexy (CHP) is an organ preservation surgery indicated for early and selected advanced laryngeal cancers. To verify the clinical usefulness of supracricoid laryngectomy versus total laryngectomy, a retrospective review was conducted.
METHODS: We summarized the clinical and postoperative data of 32 patients who received SCL over the past 9 years (1997-2005). Five-year survival rate of the SCL patient group (29 cases) was compared with that of the patient group receiving total laryngectomy (35 cases) within the same period.
RESULTS: Wound infection was detected in 12 patients (38%). Those with severe infection, which required surgical intervention, included two cases of ruptured pexis and two cases showing cricoid cartilage necrosis induced by Forestier disease. There were two T4 cases that resulted in extensive excision. In one case, excision involved the posterior part of the cricoid cartilage resulting in insufficient closure of the neoglottis; the patient received total laryngectomy 30 months after SCL-CHEP because of persistent aspiration of liquid diet. In the other T4 case, the tumor invaded the thyroid and arytenoid cartilages but not the cricoid cartilage. Reposition of the remaining corniculate cartilage resulted in sufficient closure of the neoglottis; this patient subsequently acquired satisfactory laryngeal function. The 5-year overall survival rate was 86% for SCL group and 61% for the total laryngectomy group (limited to Stages III and IV glottic cancers). The causes of the four deaths were distant metastasis, neck metastasis, and intercurrent disease, respectively. Two patients are alive with distant disease.
CONCLUSION: Through our experience in this series, the functional and oncological results of SCL showed certain advantages over those of total laryngectomy. Particularly, the clinical impact of SCL-CHEP was impressive; this technique needs is recommended to both head and neck surgeons and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17869042     DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2007.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx        ISSN: 0385-8146            Impact factor:   1.863


  10 in total

Review 1.  Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy: what do we not know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Nicole Pizzorni; Francesco Mozzanica; Marco Fantini; Daniela Ginocchio; Andy Bertolin; Erika Crosetti; Giovanni Succo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Soon-Hyun Ahn; Hyun Jun Hong; Soon Young Kwon; Kee Hwan Kwon; Jong-Lyel Roh; Junsun Ryu; Jun Hee Park; Seung-Kuk Baek; Guk Haeng Lee; Sei Young Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Man Ki Chung; Young Hoon Joo; Yong Bae Ji; Jeong Hun Hah; Minsu Kwon; Young Min Park; Chang Myeon Song; Sung-Chan Shin; Chang Hwan Ryu; Doh Young Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jae Won Chang; Ha Min Jeong; Jae-Keun Cho; Wonjae Cha; Byung Joon Chun; Ik Joon Choi; Hyo Geun Choi; Kang Dae Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 3.  Conservative treatment for advanced T3-T4 laryngeal cancer: meta-analysis of key oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Giuditta Mannelli; Maria Silvia Lazio; Paolo Luparello; Oreste Gallo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy: oncological results.

Authors:  Ilhan Topaloğlu; Muhlis Bal; Ziya Salturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Supracricoid laryngectomy: oncologic validity and functional safety.

Authors:  Kwang Jae Cho; Young Hoon Joo; Dong Il Sun; Min Sik Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Delayed wound infection after supracricoid partial laryngectomy following failure of high dose radiation.

Authors:  Meijin Nakayama; Makito Okamoto; Yutomo Seino; Shunsuke Miyamoto; Takashi Matsuki; Akiko Ogawa
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Current trends in initial management of laryngeal cancer: the declining use of open surgery.

Authors:  Carl E Silver; Jonathan J Beitler; Ashok R Shaha; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Evaluation of swallowing function after supracricoid laryngectomy as a primary or salvage procedure.

Authors:  Francesco Bussu; Jacopo Galli; Venanzio Valenza; Lucia D'Alatri; Daniele Antonio Pizzuto; Giovanni Almadori; Alessandro Giordano; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Evidence and evidence gaps of laryngeal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Susanne Wiegand
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 10.  Limitations and Opportunities in Open Laryngeal Organ Preservation Surgery: Current Role of OPHLs.

Authors:  Giovanni Succo; Erika Crosetti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.