OBJECTIVE: Deficiency of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) causes microsatellite instability (MSI) in a subset of colorectal cancers. Patients with these tumours have a better prognosis and may have an altered response to chemotherapy. Some of the tumours are caused by hereditary mutations (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer or Lynch syndrome), but most are epigenetic changes of sporadic origin. The aim of this study was to define a robust and inexpensive strategy for such classification in clinical practice. METHOD: Tumours and blood samples from 262 successive patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas were collected. Expression of the MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was compared with MSI DNA analysis. Methylation analysis of MLH1 and mutation analysis for BRAF V600E were compared in samples with MSI and/or lack of MLH1 expression to determine if the tumour was likely to be sporadic. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (14.9%) of the tumours showed MMR deficiency by IHC or by microsatellite analysis. Sporadic inactivation by methylation of MLH1 promoter was found in 35 patients whereby the BRAF activating V600E mutation, indicating sporadic origin, was found in 32 tumours. On the basis of molecular characteristics we found 223 patients with intact MMR, 35 patients with sporadic MMR deficiency, and four patients who were likely to have hereditary MMR deficiency. CONCLUSION: To obtain the maximal benefit for patients and clinicians, MMR testing should be supplemented with MLH1 methylation or BRAF mutation analysis to distinguish sporadic patients from likely hereditary ones. MMR deficient patients with sporadic disease can be reassured of the better prognosis and the likely hereditary cases should receive genetic counselling.
OBJECTIVE: Deficiency of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) causes microsatellite instability (MSI) in a subset of colorectal cancers. Patients with these tumours have a better prognosis and may have an altered response to chemotherapy. Some of the tumours are caused by hereditary mutations (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer or Lynch syndrome), but most are epigenetic changes of sporadic origin. The aim of this study was to define a robust and inexpensive strategy for such classification in clinical practice. METHOD:Tumours and blood samples from 262 successive patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas were collected. Expression of the MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was compared with MSI DNA analysis. Methylation analysis of MLH1 and mutation analysis for BRAFV600E were compared in samples with MSI and/or lack of MLH1 expression to determine if the tumour was likely to be sporadic. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (14.9%) of the tumours showed MMR deficiency by IHC or by microsatellite analysis. Sporadic inactivation by methylation of MLH1 promoter was found in 35 patients whereby the BRAF activating V600E mutation, indicating sporadic origin, was found in 32 tumours. On the basis of molecular characteristics we found 223 patients with intact MMR, 35 patients with sporadic MMR deficiency, and four patients who were likely to have hereditary MMR deficiency. CONCLUSION: To obtain the maximal benefit for patients and clinicians, MMR testing should be supplemented with MLH1 methylation or BRAF mutation analysis to distinguish sporadic patients from likely hereditary ones. MMR deficient patients with sporadic disease can be reassured of the better prognosis and the likely hereditary cases should receive genetic counselling.
Authors: Lars Henrik Jensen; Anders Aamann Rasmussen; Lene Byriel; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Dorthe Gylling Crüger; Jan Lindebjerg; Peter V Danenberg; Anders Jakobsen; Kathleen Danenberg Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Mine S Cicek; Noralane M Lindor; Steven Gallinger; Bharati Bapat; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Joanne Young; Daniel Buchanan; Michael D Walsh; Loic Le Marchand; Terrilea Burnett; Polly A Newcomb; William M Grady; Robert W Haile; Graham Casey; Sarah J Plummer; Lisa A Krumroy; John A Baron; Stephen N Thibodeau Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Lars Henrik Jensen; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Dorthe Gylling Crüger; Jan Lindebjerg; Steen Kolvraa; Peter Danenberg; Kathleen Danenberg; Anders Jakobsen Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2011-07-06
Authors: Timothy J Price; Carol Beeke; Amanda Rose Townsend; Louisa Lo; Roy Amitesh; Robert Padbury; David Roder; Guy Maddern; James Moore; Christos Karapetis Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Wilfredo E De Jesus-Monge; Carmen Gonzalez-Keelan; Ronghua Zhao; Stanley R Hamilton; Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas; Marcia Cruz-Correa Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Bryony A Thompson; David E Goldgar; Carol Paterson; Mark Clendenning; Rhiannon Walters; Sven Arnold; Michael T Parsons; Walsh Michael D; Steven Gallinger; Robert W Haile; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Loic Lemarchand; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Stephen N Thibodeau; Joanne P Young; Daniel D Buchanan; Sean V Tavtigian; Amanda B Spurdle Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Yanqun Liu; Min Hoe Chew; Xue Wei Goh; Soo Yong Tan; Carol Tien Tau Loi; Yuen Ming Tan; Hai Yang Law; Poh Koon Koh; Choong Leong Tang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 3.240