Literature DB >> 17868288

Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know?

Phillip B Fenberg1, Kaustuv Roy.   

Abstract

Size-selective harvesting, where the large individuals of a particular species are preferentially taken, is common in both marine and terrestrial habitats. Preferential removal of larger individuals of a species has been shown to have a negative effect on its demography, life history and ecology, and empirical studies are increasingly documenting such impacts. But determining whether the observed changes represent evolutionary response or phenotypic plasticity remains a challenge. In addition, the problem is not recognized in most management plans for fish and marine invertebrates that still mandate a minimum size restriction. We use examples from both aquatic and terrestrial habitats to illustrate some of the biological consequences of size-selective harvesting and discuss possible future directions of research as well as changes in management policy needed to mitigate its negative biological impacts.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17868288     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03522.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  52 in total

1.  Ecosystem-based fisheries management requires a change to the selective fishing philosophy.

Authors:  Shijie Zhou; Anthony D M Smith; André E Punt; Anthony J Richardson; Mark Gibbs; Elizabeth A Fulton; Sean Pascoe; Catherine Bulman; Peter Bayliss; Keith Sainsbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence of market-driven size-selective fishing and the mediating effects of biological and institutional factors.

Authors:  Sheila M W Reddy; Allison Wentz; Octavio Aburto-Oropeza; Martin Maxey; Sriniketh Nagavarapu; Heather M Leslie
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Extinction risk in extant marine species integrating palaeontological and biodistributional data.

Authors:  K S Collins; S M Edie; G Hunt; K Roy; D Jablonski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Managing wildlife for ecological, socioeconomic, and evolutionary sustainability.

Authors:  Nils Bunnefeld; Aidan Keane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evidence of size-selective evolution in the fighting conch from prehistoric subsistence harvesting.

Authors:  Aaron O'Dea; Marian Lynne Shaffer; Douglas R Doughty; Thomas A Wake; Felix A Rodriguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Consequences of fisheries-induced evolution for population productivity and recovery potential.

Authors:  Anna Kuparinen; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Historical baselines and the future of shell calcification for a foundation species in a changing ocean.

Authors:  Catherine A Pfister; Kaustuv Roy; J Timothy Wootton; Sophie J McCoy; Robert T Paine; Thomas H Suchanek; Eric Sanford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evolutionary impacts of fishing: overfishing's 'Darwinian debt'.

Authors:  John M Pandolfi
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2009-06-09

9.  Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild.

Authors:  Chris T Darimont; Stephanie M Carlson; Michael T Kinnison; Paul C Paquet; Thomas E Reimchen; Christopher C Wilmers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Using insights from animal behaviour and behavioural ecology to inform marine conservation initiatives.

Authors:  Rohan M Brooker; William E Feeney; James R White; Rachel P Manassa; Jacob L Johansen; Danielle L Dixson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.